- Messages
- 6,985
- Reactions
- 21,487
Truth, Why Antis Hate Gun Owners.
So if you take away theories of government takeovers, Socialist agendas, and invasions of personal rights what's left to create such hostility.
The reality is, gun owners have the simplest ability to exercise a constitutional right. Many of the rights that are granted in our Constitution and Bill of Rights, require detailed actions on the person wishing to exercise a particular subject, located in these documents. Why the First Amendment does guarantee certain expressions, those expressions are not automatically interpreted as an exercise of that constitutional right. However citizens in this country have the ability to simply create an object or purchase one. And they have already guaranteed the ability of exercising a right. And firearms owners do so really never having to fully exercise that right. The right to bear arms, can simply be translated in the ability of one person to use a firearm. However simply having that ownership alone automatically grants you your second right. Tada !!
It is why the simplicity of the Second Amendment is challenged by many others. Those who wish to change laws, interpret actions of constitutional rights, have a huge challenge ahead of themselves to work on the object and the possession of that objects being viable. When all other constitutional rights take much more involvement to accomplish. Our First Amendment right does give those several options, but to make those viable it takes more than simply uttering words to crowd to make a difference to show that you've exercised that First Amendment rights. However a simple purchase automatically grants that person the ability to have that firearm in their possession.
It is with this simple possession of a firearm, the animosity is created. Human nature dictates that others want what they cannot have. Why yes the anti-gun crowd could simply possess a firearm exercise their right and understand how easy it is. However they have been taught to have fear, not knowledge. Have you ever looked at the amount of anger that is generated by all ages within the anti-gun crowd? Yes, some of this is milled to create a response. But it cannot simply be all persons in this vast amount unless there is a reason. And that reason is you and I exercise our freedom so easily. That this challenges others and feeling uncomfortable with the fact that we enjoy our freedom so easily. When they have to fight much harder for other rights, that are not exercised so simply.
In closing, of course there are many other aspects such as school training, the media, and many other aspects that add to the animosity that you and I share as firearm owners. But the reality is there's only one thing different between what we have and what they have. And that is exercising a right that is easily attained. You may call it jealousy, or uneducated views. But the reality is they want what we have, and they want it attained as simple as we do. But they find that there's much due diligence involved, in guaranteeing other constitutional rights. As we see generation after generation becoming more lazy, their ability to effect change no longer is done by respectfully disagreeing. Its now done by riots and hate.
This is simply my opinion, when looking at the huge amount of hatred towards gun owners. That alone is still not enough to have the masses reject the Second Amendment so openly.
If you ever sat and wondered why anyone would want you to exercise your rights?
This is my take why as its been so long coming, long before media power and social media, and shows clear they simply want their own desired rights attained as easily.
DH.
So if you take away theories of government takeovers, Socialist agendas, and invasions of personal rights what's left to create such hostility.
The reality is, gun owners have the simplest ability to exercise a constitutional right. Many of the rights that are granted in our Constitution and Bill of Rights, require detailed actions on the person wishing to exercise a particular subject, located in these documents. Why the First Amendment does guarantee certain expressions, those expressions are not automatically interpreted as an exercise of that constitutional right. However citizens in this country have the ability to simply create an object or purchase one. And they have already guaranteed the ability of exercising a right. And firearms owners do so really never having to fully exercise that right. The right to bear arms, can simply be translated in the ability of one person to use a firearm. However simply having that ownership alone automatically grants you your second right. Tada !!
It is why the simplicity of the Second Amendment is challenged by many others. Those who wish to change laws, interpret actions of constitutional rights, have a huge challenge ahead of themselves to work on the object and the possession of that objects being viable. When all other constitutional rights take much more involvement to accomplish. Our First Amendment right does give those several options, but to make those viable it takes more than simply uttering words to crowd to make a difference to show that you've exercised that First Amendment rights. However a simple purchase automatically grants that person the ability to have that firearm in their possession.
It is with this simple possession of a firearm, the animosity is created. Human nature dictates that others want what they cannot have. Why yes the anti-gun crowd could simply possess a firearm exercise their right and understand how easy it is. However they have been taught to have fear, not knowledge. Have you ever looked at the amount of anger that is generated by all ages within the anti-gun crowd? Yes, some of this is milled to create a response. But it cannot simply be all persons in this vast amount unless there is a reason. And that reason is you and I exercise our freedom so easily. That this challenges others and feeling uncomfortable with the fact that we enjoy our freedom so easily. When they have to fight much harder for other rights, that are not exercised so simply.
In closing, of course there are many other aspects such as school training, the media, and many other aspects that add to the animosity that you and I share as firearm owners. But the reality is there's only one thing different between what we have and what they have. And that is exercising a right that is easily attained. You may call it jealousy, or uneducated views. But the reality is they want what we have, and they want it attained as simple as we do. But they find that there's much due diligence involved, in guaranteeing other constitutional rights. As we see generation after generation becoming more lazy, their ability to effect change no longer is done by respectfully disagreeing. Its now done by riots and hate.
This is simply my opinion, when looking at the huge amount of hatred towards gun owners. That alone is still not enough to have the masses reject the Second Amendment so openly.
If you ever sat and wondered why anyone would want you to exercise your rights?
This is my take why as its been so long coming, long before media power and social media, and shows clear they simply want their own desired rights attained as easily.
DH.
