Platinum Supporter
Silver Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 5,509
- Reactions
- 8,921
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really? He killed himself?As far as I am concerned the two that lied got off WAY too lightly. Heck I have seen military members get more than what these two got for much less...
I see the Airman who pointed the gun and shot the guy already took care of himself....
Yes, yes he did.Really? He killed himself?
Yeah, that was reported on earlier. I think it was mentioned a few times in the many P320 threads here.Really? He killed himself?
This is why the way the whole P320 kerfuffle was handled so badly, not just by Sig but by the gun community as a whole. Repeating unfounded accusations as if they were true, highlighting every last mishap with a Sig and ignore all other mishaps (falsely amplifying the "problem" with Sigs), not demanding concrete evidence of the issue (like what was demonstrated with the initial drop-safe failure) and accepting every "oppsie" as the gun's fault when there is other evidence suggesting otherwise. . . This was a massive failure of process by everyone. And that process failure gave cover to bad/stupid actors who thought they could uses the incorrectly amplified perceptions of the P320 as cover for their own misdeeds. In a few of these cases it may have even worked, as people are still arguing about the cause even as those cases have pretty solid evidence of mishandling.That's why the P320 is such a great gun for personal defense….you can use the Baldwin Defense "I never even touched the trigger, it just went off!"
And then when one throws in that many shooters will lower the pull on their triggers accidents will happen that are not the fault of the gun, but operator error instead. I have 2- P250s and 4 P320s and have never had a problem. Always a first but so far, none.Yeah, that was reported on earlier. I think it was mentioned a few times in the many P320 threads here.
This is why the way the whole P320 kerfuffle was handled so badly, not just by Sig but by the gun community as a whole. Repeating unfounded accusations as if they were true, highlighting every last mishap with a Sig and ignore all other mishaps (falsely amplifying the "problem" with Sigs), not demanding concrete evidence of the issue (like what was demonstrated with the initial drop-safe failure) and accepting every "oppsie" as the gun's fault when there is other evidence suggesting otherwise. . . This was a massive failure of process by everyone. And that process failure gave cover to bad/stupid actors who thought they could uses the incorrectly amplified perceptions of the P320 as cover for their own misdeeds. In a few of these cases it may have even worked, as people are still arguing about the cause even as those cases have pretty solid evidence of mishandling.
This is why problem replication is so damn important. We run into this phenomena in the tech spaces too, with lots of people blaming all kinds of things for problems and failures. But until there is replication user error and improper procedures cannot be ruled out as the root cause. This is even more true with mechanical systems, which are often easier to fully understand by single individuals. It is also why I did so much testing and validation work on my own P320s, and attempted to not only replicate but understand the claimed failures supposedly being demonstrated online.
I have noticed a dip in the constant "here is another discharge with the P320!" I think the gun community as a whole is beginning to understand that the gun does not have a problem, but there are a subset of people who are not treating it with all due respect. This seems to echo the teething problems Glock had in the 80s, and while Glock's "self discharge" problems never really went away, the understanding of what caused those discharges certainly impacted how widely such incidents were reported. And now many people have the false impression that such discharges are rare when in actuality they are much more common than we all care to admit. Stupid is as stupid does, and stupid is still a universal constant, no matter what platform stupid has.
As went Glock, so now goes Sig.
If it was a problem with the gun it could be replicated. With what like a million something in circulation that have not gone off vs the 80 or so alleged discharges that nobody can repeat with the same gun.And then when one throws in that many shooters will lower the pull on their triggers accidents will happen that are not the fault of the gun, but operator error instead. I have 2- P250s and 4 P320s and have never had a problem. Always a first but so far, none.
Yep, these are not mutually exclusive.The P320 doesn't just go off. And SIG still sucks.
Yea the testing program was a load of sh!t. Some money exchanged hands behind closed doors and certain employment opportunities were guaranteed.Yep, these are not mutually exclusive.
I like some of Sig's optics offerings, but have never cared for their firearms at all. I never got the hype for the P320, and the way Sig "won" the military contracts is ridiculous. It's even worse when looking at the M7 somehow steamrolling its way as the replacement for the M4. There is definitely something shady there that needs proper investigation.