JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
4,210
Reactions
6,918
Quite often in the course of human events when seeking to obtain a certain gun, one must buy another (or two) from the seller in order to acquire the actual one sought (or to convince one's self that some expense can be "made back").

Such may have been the case regarding a nice old '86 Winchester I was after, and then was "required" (by myself or the seller) to also take a Remington shotgun and what seemed to be left of a Remington .257 Roberts.

Technically, it did not qualify as a textbook "basket case", since it was after a fashion "assembled" with what appeared to be all its parts. That was the only thing going for a rusted, butchered and shade-tree"fixed" gun. I now regret that I took no "before" pictures and narrative will have to suffice.

Fuzzy with rust from muzzle to receiver, the seller said it had been in the trunk of Grandpa's car for a few years. But it could be recognized by the round bolt handle and front sight as a Remington Model 722. The stock seemed to be coated in Spar Varnish of multiple coats, done WITH the action on the wood. (Generous amounts of varnish had happily leaped on to fresh pastures of steel.) Large gouges existed on the comb and on the forearm, as if the rifle was in a truck rack while the Spar Varnish dried (a required time period of weeks).

Attached to the butt end was NOT the checkered aluminum Remington original plate, but a good ol' Pachmayer. But its final "fitting" (a term used and exhibited here loosely) was actually done with a penknife, most probably on a deer stand. The edges of the base of the pad resembled the chipped edge of an Indian arrowhead. Perhaps the erstwhile craftsman was just as proud as the pad was above the contour of the buttstock.

The butttstock showed a gaping hole with longitudinal chips where the butt sling swivel stud had once resided far too close to the edge of the butt, exacerbated by a horribly crude cut (of visible levels, starts and stops) done when the pad was "attached". Holes for pad-mounting screws were overly numerous and "wowed" out. Grandpa had done what Grandpa could afford with the tools at hand.

1704734097406.jpeg
The only "before" picture in existence, this is the buttstock section amputated, showing multiple enlarged screw holes and a chipped sling stud orifice right at the edge, and the "mating surface" to the pad.

After-market wood stocks pushed the $500 mark with add-ons. Three applications of heavy volatile varnish remover showed the original stock to be salvageable...perhaps. It is rare to find a 722 stock that does not have a "cut-out" for the receiver peep, and this was one.

It was decided to amputate this 1/2" section of the butt replete with problem areas. Yes, glass/epoxy could have repaired most, but the chipped sling stud hole would ALWAYS show as a repair. Best to start clean, wood spacers never look right, so a plain black spacer would be installed ahead of a new Pachmayer Presentation. Any future owner of small stature (child, female) will find an easy conversion to a shorter length of pull with only minor re-fitting of the pad.

Metal was disassembled, and each part soaked, then gently massaged with solvent-dripping steel wool. A striking testimony to old-school bluing salts and gun oil, the action re-assembled showed NO rust.

More attention to the wood started to look like some scary pretty got out of the Remington wood shop in 1953.

Brownell's Acra-Glas Gel went into the recoil lug recess and just enough forward for a pad under the chamber, barrel floated. ('cuz a Roberts deserves it.)

Leupold Short Action STD Bridge Mount and a Vari-X III 3.5-10 (which showed up on NWFA right when I needed it!) became its new eyes.

...and "Ol' Bob" is back from Spa Treatment and lookin' like a new man!

1704735707885.jpeg

1704735760408.jpeg
 
I have adopted a few of those!
The worst was a Ruger Single Six from 1962. It had been owned by Moms cowboy uncle. It was covered in red rust, had a nail for a cylinder pin, and only fired on 3 chambers. It looked like it had been covered in horse sweat and put away wet.
After replacing all the springs, the firing pin, the center pin, and the grip frame, it was stripped sanded and reblued.
All but the deepest rust pits were removed, but the lettering is faint from the damaged metal being removed.
This has become a favorite gun. it shoots well and has a history. DR
 
Quite often in the course of human events when seeking to obtain a certain gun, one must buy another (or two) from the seller in order to acquire the actual one sought (or to convince one's self that some expense can be "made back").

Such may have been the case regarding a nice old '86 Winchester I was after, and then was "required" (by myself or the seller) to also take a Remington shotgun and what seemed to be left of a Remington .257 Roberts.

Technically, it did not qualify as a textbook "basket case", since it was after a fashion "assembled" with what appeared to be all its parts. That was the only thing going for a rusted, butchered and shade-tree"fixed" gun. I now regret that I took no "before" pictures and narrative will have to suffice.

Fuzzy with rust from muzzle to receiver, the seller said it had been in the trunk of Grandpa's car for a few years. But it could be recognized by the round bolt handle and front sight as a Remington Model 722. The stock seemed to be coated in Spar Varnish of multiple coats, done WITH the action on the wood. (Generous amounts of varnish had happily leaped on to fresh pastures of steel.) Large gouges existed on the comb and on the forearm, as if the rifle was in a truck rack while the Spar Varnish dried (a required time period of weeks).

Attached to the butt end was NOT the checkered aluminum Remington original plate, but a good ol' Pachmayer. But its final "fitting" (a term used and exhibited here loosely) was actually done with a penknife, most probably on a deer stand. The edges of the base of the pad resembled the chipped edge of an Indian arrowhead. Perhaps the erstwhile craftsman was just as proud as the pad was above the contour of the buttstock.

The butttstock showed a gaping hole with longitudinal chips where the butt sling swivel stud had once resided far too close to the edge of the butt, exacerbated by a horribly crude cut (of visible levels, starts and stops) done when the pad was "attached". Holes for pad-mounting screws were overly numerous and "wowed" out. Grandpa had done what Grandpa could afford with the tools at hand.

View attachment 1797740
The only "before" picture in existence, this is the buttstock section amputated, showing multiple enlarged screw holes and a chipped sling stud orifice right at the edge, and the "mating surface" to the pad.

After-market wood stocks pushed the $500 mark with add-ons. Three applications of heavy volatile varnish remover showed the original stock to be salvageable...perhaps. It is rare to find a 722 stock that does not have a "cut-out" for the receiver peep, and this was one.

It was decided to amputate this 1/2" section of the butt replete with problem areas. Yes, glass/epoxy could have repaired most, but the chipped sling stud hole would ALWAYS show as a repair. Best to start clean, wood spacers never look right, so a plain black spacer would be installed ahead of a new Pachmayer Presentation. Any future owner of small stature (child, female) will find an easy conversion to a shorter length of pull with only minor re-fitting of the pad.

Metal was disassembled, and each part soaked, then gently massaged with solvent-dripping steel wool. A striking testimony to old-school bluing salts and gun oil, the action re-assembled showed NO rust.

More attention to the wood started to look like some scary pretty got out of the Remington wood shop in 1953.

Brownell's Acra-Glas Gel went into the recoil lug recess and just enough forward for a pad under the chamber, barrel floated. ('cuz a Roberts deserves it.)

Leupold Short Action STD Bridge Mount and a Vari-X III 3.5-10 (which showed up on NWFA right when I needed it!) became its new eyes.

...and "Ol' Bob" is back from Spa Treatment and lookin' like a new man!

View attachment 1797747

View attachment 1797748
Looks AMAZING! You sure they didn't use a chainsaw instead of a penknife on that old mating surface?

:eek:
 
Gorgeous rifle!
Nicely done, Spitpatch.

How's it shoot?
Ain't got there yet. Will report.
An adjustable Remington 700 trigger will drop right in.
Yes. (Even have a Timney :cool: on hand.) However, these triggers are VERY good in their own right. Gonna mess with this one a bit (crisp at the break, but take-up needs diminished).
 
As to the striking discovery of the figure in the wood, it should be kept in mind that it probably never looked like this even when new. Back in the day (and sometimes even now), such figure was NOT necessarily a selling point to "Joe Sixpack lookin' for a good huntin' gun."

Very often (almost always and even today), such radical figure would be well disguised under a healthy cover of stain because, "God wanted gunstocks to be a uniform reddish-brown", and so they were made to be so regardless of the treasure concealed.

If Joe showed up in deer camp with Barber-Pole stripes up and down his Remington in 1954, his buddies might not want to share a tent with him.

Whoever concealed all this under Spar Varnish was almost assuredly beaten to the punch by the Remington factory itself.
 
Good job, Spitpatch! Hope it shoots well for ya. How's the bore look?
Pristine. Grandpa knew which end was which on a cleaning rod, Hoppe's and "3 in 1" oil. Also, such guns were rarely (if ever) shot for "recreational purposes", suffering only a couple rounds to check the sights and one more for the deer each year. A gun like this could easily have less than a box or two of rounds fired through it.
 
Pristine. Grandpa knew which end was which on a cleaning rod, Hoppe's and "3 in 1" oil. Also, such guns were rarely (if ever) shot for "recreational purposes", suffering only a couple rounds to check the sights and one more for the deer each year. A gun like this could easily have less than a box or two of rounds fired through it.
Very nice. We'll be looking forward to a range report.
What did you finish the stock with? It looks great.
 
Very nice. We'll be looking forward to a range report.
What did you finish the stock with? It looks great.
Two coats of sanding sealer (I'd go for 4 if I did it again...to easier seal the pores), 6 coats of Tru Oil, each allowed at least 24hrs to dry and each rubbed down with Fourple-Ought steel wool. Scott's Gold and Minwax Paste Wax to protect. (These two products are universal in my camp for exterior guarding of metal AND wood on good guns.)

Edited to add: NO stain. Tru Oil imparts a degree of stain effect with each coat, and enough to avoid the "blonde" look that might even today get one shunned in deer camp. (The modern Browning maple stocks are the extreme of this, appealing to some.)

1704812131025.jpeg
Prior to any finishing product applied, this was at the buttpad fitting stage, revealing possibilities only imagined.
 
Last Edited:

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

Back Top