Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 2,899
- Reactions
- 9,883
After much internal debate, i went with the tisas ds carry for $512 shipped.
Thanks for yalls help, im sure id be happy with any of them but im feeling good about the tisas

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After much internal debate, i went with the tisas ds carry for $512 shipped.
Thanks for yalls help, im sure id be happy with any of them but im feeling good about the tisas

Not long ago, Sarco was selling factory second bare frames from RIA for $180. They sold out. So people will pay that kind of money for just a frame, but hesitate at $275 for the complete gun.However, I'm keeping the other RIA. The one that looks like an army gun. Which I did not originally intend on doing. For a couple of reasons. (1) It's a good shooting gun, I can do well with it. (2) I just don't feel like giving it away for anything like $275 or $300. Because I can shoot the heck out of it without thinking twice, saving wear and tear on a more valuable gun.
Mine was reliable. It ate everything I fed it. Never a FTF. Never jammed.. But the trigger pull was hellacious and the finish wasn't the greatest. It was a sub 400 dollar gun, and I got a much better one on sale for about $150 more. I sold it to a friend along with some accessories and didn't take a bath on it because of a pricing error where I bought it. They sold it to me for 100 bucks less than they should have.I bought Girsan 1911 because it had the feature set I wanted at the price point I was looking for. I also went into it knowing full well of the potential risk of buying a Turkish gun.
I don't plan on putting a ton of rounds through it, but so far it has been 100% reliable (300 fmj and 50 Fed HST). Time will tell if I bought a turd or not….
This is the main reason they don't bring much money when sold used. Selling used in the USA you're competing with labor making new guns in Asia.I'll use my RIA as an example. I believe it to be an EXCELLENT value for the $379
Well, I guess I am in luck then since I am not trying to sell mine nor have any plans to!This is the main reason they don't bring much money when sold used.
Those second thoughts may go away when you can shoot your new one, but chances are they will return when you need to field strip, clean and reassemble your new one.Welp i was going to post pictures but im stuck in the queue. Hopefully i can pick it up tomorrow, but it feels nice! And its always a good sign when the ffl has a positive comment about my purchase.
Yeah, im still having second thoughts about a cz or cz style gun but i hope those go away when i can shoot this one.
End the end, this was the calculated choice, and the cz/tanfoglio was just what i wanted. This tisas ticks more boxes for me though.
Well, I have a CZ 75 BD (And really like it) BUT after getting my RIA and it being a series 70 with a fantastic trigger (I gave it a minor 'trigger job' and got to around 3.5ish lbs) I don't know if ever want anything ELSE but series 70 1911's.Yeah, im still having second thoughts about a cz or cz style gun but i hope those go away when i can shoot this one.
Based on the two RIA guns that I've had and fired, I don't see anything wrong with the product. It's just that Colt (for example) who makes them in Connecticut has to pay their workers significantly more money than Armscor in the Philippines has to pay theirs. Which results in a huge competitive advantage in selling a new gun. But which translates to the lower resale value of used RIA guns. And exactly why I'm not giving up the RIA that I mentioned. It isn't worth letting it go for what I can get out of it. I'd rather give it away to a gunless friend than sell it for what I can get out of it. I've done that with another gun that had low resale value.Well, I guess I am in luck then since I am not trying to sell mine nor have any plans to!
I've mentioned this in another thread somewhere. But another reason is technology. A lot of work that was done by hand in the past is now done by more modern techniques. And here again, I'm thinking about Colt. So some of the extra cost of inflating labor value is recovered by applications of CNC, etc. Better ways to make a mousetrap kind of thing.It's my opinion based on reflecting upon prices over decades that the prices of new guns have not kept up with inflation. In general, with respect to common models. There are multiple reasons for this.
I wonder how they will be able to manage the same markups and prices with the US produced RIAs .I'd like to see the paperwork that shows how much it costs importers to bring the guns in from Philippines and Turkey. We might be shocked at the actual mark-up between those figures and what is paid at retail.
Will be interesting to see, but I think the move to USA was to eliminate supply side problems.I wonder how they will be able to manage the same markups and prices with the US produced RIAs .
The capital set-up in the Philippines for making 1911's will likely stay there. The stuff they will or are making here won't be priced at $379. The 5.0 carries an MSRP of over $1,500.I wonder how they will be able to manage the same markups and prices with the US produced RIAs
Not only that but I'm thinking they could have found somebody a little more 'intelligent' than some goofball with his shirt hanging out and looks (and sounds) like someone coming down off of an 'all nighter' to describe the gun.Not my definition of "Made in USA". Lame…..
You might not be part of the target audience?Not only that but I'm thinking they could have found somebody a little more 'intelligent' than some goofball with his shirt hanging out and looks (and sounds) like someone coming down off of an 'all nighter' to describe the gun.
True, true. You have to look at the demographic they're looking to sell to. It isn't the middle class.You might not be part of the target audience?