- Messages
- 225
- Reactions
- 0
rsmccsman says "You jump to a lot of conclusions saying this Joe went bad. Metro issued him a CHL and 7 blue cards. (Clark County Nevada requires handguns to be registered and you have to carry proof it's called a blue card.) Why would they issue a CHL and have a guy with top secret clearance pass numerous background checks if he was a good guy who went bad? It doesn't make sense to me."
It really doesn't matter what he did in the past, nor what security clearance he had. What is important is what he did that day. Let me give you some examples of that idea not holding any water, regarding him having a CHL and security clearance.
• Chief Dave Brame Tacoma Police Dept murdered his wife after having the public trust for many years. Went through a psychological testing before being given the job.
• The Muslim Doctor in the U.S. Army that went on a shooting rampage and killed a lot of people on the Army Fort. He was a certified doctor and a Officer.
Don't you think these people probably went through some extensive tests and had the public or medical community trust before they did what they did? They still made some bad choices and WENT BAD.
One other point you brought up that was not based in fact. The security equipment was not tampered with, nor was it taken into evidence. The security system camera in that area was not working. There was no conspiracy and this was part of the Costco managers testimony (maybe Costco is in on it too). It is a DVD burning system and the system is still there working. DVDs were burnt for the time period during this incident occurred including the suspects actions in other parts of the store before the shooting.
Your very flowery long missive does not cover one important point that is very germane to the subject that is listed in a link on this thread. The Coroner's jury found the officer innocent of wrong doing after a long drawn out review of ALL the facts. Maybe it ended up that way because the black helicopter people fixed the jury with special mob connections :>)
If you really want to understand when an Officer can and can not shoot please review the U.S. Supreme court case called Graham vs O'Connor. This is a definitive directive from the high court of the land regarding this issue.
One last thing. May I suggest you become familiar with the facts in a case before you start slinging mud at people who post here and before you judge their character enough to determine whether they should join the Police force or not. Also whether they can pass a Psych test. Maybe take the log out of your eye before talking about the speck in someone elses eye.....maybe?
It really doesn't matter what he did in the past, nor what security clearance he had. What is important is what he did that day. Let me give you some examples of that idea not holding any water, regarding him having a CHL and security clearance.
• Chief Dave Brame Tacoma Police Dept murdered his wife after having the public trust for many years. Went through a psychological testing before being given the job.
• The Muslim Doctor in the U.S. Army that went on a shooting rampage and killed a lot of people on the Army Fort. He was a certified doctor and a Officer.
Don't you think these people probably went through some extensive tests and had the public or medical community trust before they did what they did? They still made some bad choices and WENT BAD.
One other point you brought up that was not based in fact. The security equipment was not tampered with, nor was it taken into evidence. The security system camera in that area was not working. There was no conspiracy and this was part of the Costco managers testimony (maybe Costco is in on it too). It is a DVD burning system and the system is still there working. DVDs were burnt for the time period during this incident occurred including the suspects actions in other parts of the store before the shooting.
Your very flowery long missive does not cover one important point that is very germane to the subject that is listed in a link on this thread. The Coroner's jury found the officer innocent of wrong doing after a long drawn out review of ALL the facts. Maybe it ended up that way because the black helicopter people fixed the jury with special mob connections :>)
If you really want to understand when an Officer can and can not shoot please review the U.S. Supreme court case called Graham vs O'Connor. This is a definitive directive from the high court of the land regarding this issue.
One last thing. May I suggest you become familiar with the facts in a case before you start slinging mud at people who post here and before you judge their character enough to determine whether they should join the Police force or not. Also whether they can pass a Psych test. Maybe take the log out of your eye before talking about the speck in someone elses eye.....maybe?