Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The worst ammo Ive experienced this with is Hornady XTP. I would get just 2 chamberings and it would set back .027". I actually have an old thread in here on this about 10 years ago, I also was tempted to give Hornady a call but never did. Some corbon ammo lasted me years of rechambering carry ammo. All 45acp in 1911.What irks me is that this Hornady ammo isn't that old. I have some Rem. Golden Sabre that hasn't changed at all and that must be 5 years old.
I think I ought to give Hornady a call to hear what they may have to say. It is possible I have a lousy lot.
I thought you were asking about 1911s but I have worn out an aftermarket glock style extractor dropping the slide on a chambered round to the point it wouldn't extract reliably. My guess is most extractors are designed to have the round slide up from under them so I dont single handfeed the chamber anymore.
I have seen a fair number of chipped Glock extractors, so yeah you don't want to do the drop it in the chamber method generally. G21's especially were notorious for chipping the extractors early on.
I think that's a good answer to shoot the mangled rounds. I would not try and move the bullets back to proper length though. You will end up with either too long or loose bullets. either can cause a miss feed. Good Luck DRGreat advice, thank you. Looks like a new box of ammo is in order and I am going to see if I can bring the set back rounds out to spec then shoot them off. I am going to pick up a couple of mags dedicated to self defense carry only and other mags dedicated to range use. I have a couple of $ burning a hole in my pocket anyway.
I have to ask. Unless I missed it in an earlier post, but I read all the way through. Still could've missed it.repeated loading/unloading from the magazines
Thanks for bringing this to my attention. After decades of owning guns and shooting, this never occurred to me nor was it ever mentioned. But I can see how it might occasionally happen. I always figured extractors, in general, were made to sustain this wear. But I'm also thinking that many designs do not provide for the incoming cartridge to slide under the hook. Examples, AR-15 and Model 70 Winchester with the push-feed bolt. I think going forward I will be more judicious in single loading cartridges into breeches of certain weapons. Especially a Star Model B for which no new extractors exist on the surface of the earth.Releasing the slide on a chambered round damages the extractor.
Sure does.Releasing the slide on a chambered round damages the extractor.
Agreed. However, the Hornady Critical Defense loads (at least the ones I'm looking at in my .40 S&W Shield) are a little more pointed than the typical hollow points. I handload a bunch of loads with Hornady XTP bullets, and they are much "flatter" on the hollow point. Just eyeballing it, I wouldn't think the HCD rounds would resist much more than ball ammo. Maybe a little bit.Someone else touched on the following, I seem to recall. And that is, many hollow points kind of bump the ramp into the barrel before they chamber. FMJ / ball ammo do not present as much resistance to the ramp as hollow points. Hence set-back is more likely with the HP type design.
And on the other side of the coin, I've had some flat nose FMJ that didn't want to load well. They were a kind of conical design, but the tip of the cone was wide.Agreed. However, the Hornady Critical Defense loads (at least the ones I'm looking at in my .40 S&W Shield) are a little more pointed than the typical hollow points. I handload a bunch of loads with Hornady XTP bullets, and they are much "flatter" on the hollow point. Just eyeballing it, I wouldn't think the HCD rounds would resist much more than ball ammo. Maybe a little bit.