- Messages
- 816
- Reactions
- 182
Actually...I did. Because of the very reasons you listed as to why Kel-Tec is lower tier.
Lorcins can put lead downrange too, but I wouldn't ever put my life in the hands of either Kel-Tec or Lorcin to properly defend it.
I can draw some pretty cool, innovative stuff, but I wouldn't trust me to build it. If their design team is that good, it would behoove them to try and merge with a company that knows a thing or two about QC and manufacturing.
Well I appreciate your honesty that this is what you said and that those who came to your defense did not need to. I am curious though, just how vast is your experience with Keltec products? Personally I wouldn't pay $50 for a Lorcin, but I and others have no problem paying $250 for a PF9 or P11. How many Keltecs, have you owned, shot or carried? Are you saying you can draw something just as good on the back of a napkin? All you need is a good manufacturer to back you up. Really? If so you must be a genius and I would be really impressed. What is your better mouse trap?
Let's take a survey from those who have actually owned their products and see what the real data is about consumer satisfaction.
I'll start. I have owned 2 P11s and 2 PF9s. I loved them all and am highly satisfied and would trust my life with any of them, never any malfunctions. My only beef was the lack of availability of night sights. Which I prefer on a defensive pistol. They are light weight easy to conceal and do the specific job they were designed to do very well. They are not designed to be a duty weapon so I don't see that having the LE community "not embrace them" as such is not an issue for me.
Lets go guys, love em or hate em? Honest opinions of those who actual have first hand experience with Keltec products. Isn't that the point of this forum?
Last Edited: