- Messages
- 287
- Reactions
- 128
Hey cwegga, thanks for trying to help me sort this out, but my specific question to PhysicsGuy is regarding the specific provision numbers he used ("167; 178.29 and § 178.30") which have no reference to which law body they belong to. I don't have the inclination to try and find words in other law codes that are similar to the ones he associated with these numbers. A) I've got better things to do with my time and B) the words might match'ish coincidentally, but may not be from the same source of law. So like I said, I appreciate the effort to sleuth this stuff out, but I need to know where the numbers he used are from, especially with him associating them by mere proximity to his citation of Title 27. Thanks