Gold Lifetime
- Messages
- 28,002
- Reactions
- 75,111
@solv3nt is the solution!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@solv3nt is the solution!
I daily the p938 and shoot it weekly, I carry the sr1911lwc on off days.I don't. 1911s don't fit my hands and I don't shoot them. I have one as a representative example, but by and large do not maintain an opinion on makes and models that have little relevance to me. Their current production seems to be reliable enough that I would have zero problem with them if someone asked me on their suitability for real world use, but my impression is they have a bit of a brand surcharge for name recognition. I would also be clear these are just impressions and they may want to go ask a few 1911 guys to see what the consensus is, as that might get them a more reliable and detailed answer.
I bet you have normally proportioned hands. I have huge palms but short stubby fingers. I am of the normal palm-to-finger ratio buy a solid half inch, which means I cannot reach the slide release on basically every 1911 ever. And that makes my normal manual of arms with them a complete non-starter. They are gorgeous guns though, and I wish they worked better for me. I am not disappointed that Glocks do not fit my hand, I am disappointed the 1911 doesn't.
"Really, that low? I seem to be responsible for. . . 3...4...5...uh, some number of houses in that average. . . "
That's only the ones they know about."Really, that low? I seem to be responsible for. . . 3...4...5...uh, some number of houses in that average. . . "
Well, I am getting that home machine shop up and running at some point. . .That's only the ones they know about.
View attachment 1874718
I suppose here we are also talking about an exact and specific pile of wood, and not a commodity good that is fungible throughout time. I mean, they are the exact same picture right?
Commodity comparisons are generic, not specific. Contemporary to contemporary, not contemporary to antique.
Silly argument is silly.
[/QUOTE