- Messages
- 259
- Reactions
- 418
shoot, about the only thing I grab from Cabela's these days are their flannels when they go on sale. I don't even set foot in their firearm area since I know and expect it to be lackluster.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Last week I bought a four lb jug of tight group for $119. That is a good price.shoot, about the only thing I grab from Cabela's these days are their flannels when they go on sale. I don't even set foot in their firearm area since I know and expect it to be lackluster.
And Id argue the NRA isnt pro 2A either. The NRA hasnt done anything meaningful for us in a long time. In fact hindered us by giving into the NFA registry in 1934 and the Assault weapons ban in 1994They are a direct partner with the NRA, so they do directly support pure 2A initiatives. I know we can purity test the NRA itself too, but that have a pretty decent track record of legislative results, even with all the baggage they have. I do not view most of those discussions as "either/or" however, but rather take a more "big tent" view. Support who is getting done what you want getting done, and support the other groups with whatever cooperation and encouragement you can. It's not like there can only be a set amount of people on the field at any one time. As long as we do not let differences in strategy or opinion get in the way of cooperation with those who share similar goals we can make significant progress. Or biggest problems occur when we "no true scottsman" our way into dividing ourselves into competing factions that no longer cooperate.