Gold Supporter
- Messages
- 25,182
- Reactions
- 38,383
Thanks to @mhayd93 , @Lilhigbee , @PiratePast40 and others, I have realized it would be unhelpful to particpate in the shaping of Measure 114 as groups gather to finalize the regulations. I believe we want it to be as restrictive as possible so the courts are more likely to overturn it. This goes against my better judgement but I am going to trust the process and hope FPC, GAO or whoever challenges this measure in court, prevails.
There is a risk that if the courts don't overturn it or take their sweet time (years) to overturn it we will be living under the restrictions.
I am wondering how many members share my view of sitting back and observing the process as the Measure is tweaked by LEVO, Legislators and others and potentially becomes even more restrictive then how it is currently written?
Are there some members who think we should engage those parties who will be finalizing the Measure's language to help minimize the restrictions?
There is a risk that if the courts don't overturn it or take their sweet time (years) to overturn it we will be living under the restrictions.
I am wondering how many members share my view of sitting back and observing the process as the Measure is tweaked by LEVO, Legislators and others and potentially becomes even more restrictive then how it is currently written?
Are there some members who think we should engage those parties who will be finalizing the Measure's language to help minimize the restrictions?
Last Edited: