- Messages
- 680
- Reactions
- 1,266
So that title is as egregious as it gets, and is alarming. But I'm reading this article which basically reprints the executive order, and I'm not arriving at the same conclusion. The context is unclear (to me) as it repeatedly says 'U.S. operations' which does that mean operations by the U.S. abroad, or operations in the U.S.?
Maybe someone can read this thing and determine if this really is an authorization of use of force against citizens or is it something more to do with citizens as casualties of the 'war on terror' as the actual executive order is titled, "Executive Order — United States Policy on Pre- and Post-Strike Measures to Address Civilian Casualties in U.S. Operations Involving the Use of Force"
Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't put it past the Socialist in Chief to pass yet another draconian and unlawful/unconstitutional executive order, but I'm not sure this is it.
Read the order for yourself here: <broken link removed>
What say you?
Maybe someone can read this thing and determine if this really is an authorization of use of force against citizens or is it something more to do with citizens as casualties of the 'war on terror' as the actual executive order is titled, "Executive Order — United States Policy on Pre- and Post-Strike Measures to Address Civilian Casualties in U.S. Operations Involving the Use of Force"
Don't get me wrong, I wouldn't put it past the Socialist in Chief to pass yet another draconian and unlawful/unconstitutional executive order, but I'm not sure this is it.
Read the order for yourself here: <broken link removed>
What say you?