With the hearing scheduled for Monday, a bit of a potential issue has been brought up in the plantiffs ability to continue pushing the legal challenge forward.
CA's new law (Sen Bill 1327) requires that any challenge to any CA 2A related law, all court and attorney's fees accrued by the state must be paid for by the prevailing party. So... if the Honorable Judge Benitez rules in favor of the 2A (which he will) then the pro-2A side will not only be responsibe for their own legal and court fees to challenge that law, we will also be responsible to pay CA for all the legal fees CA has accruded in defense of their infringment law.
IOW, they know best, and if you try to tell them then are wrong or what they are doing is unconstitutional, then you have to foot the whole bill for both sides if you win.
Only Kalifederation could come up with something so unconstitutional in the fight against unconstitutional infringments. Friggin mind blower. Just make it offical already. Secede from the U.S. and be done with it!
CA's new law (Sen Bill 1327) requires that any challenge to any CA 2A related law, all court and attorney's fees accrued by the state must be paid for by the prevailing party. So... if the Honorable Judge Benitez rules in favor of the 2A (which he will) then the pro-2A side will not only be responsibe for their own legal and court fees to challenge that law, we will also be responsible to pay CA for all the legal fees CA has accruded in defense of their infringment law.
IOW, they know best, and if you try to tell them then are wrong or what they are doing is unconstitutional, then you have to foot the whole bill for both sides if you win.
Only Kalifederation could come up with something so unconstitutional in the fight against unconstitutional infringments. Friggin mind blower. Just make it offical already. Secede from the U.S. and be done with it!
Last Edited: