- Messages
- 202
- Reactions
- 107
Everyone might want to read the application for, and the actual search warrant, that the judge granted. This "victims" apartment had been under surveillance for some time. The boyfriend, who was in bed with the "victim" had priors for drugs and unlawful weapons possession. The boyfriend has been using the "victim's" vehicle to transport narcotics in to, and out of, this apartment. This apartment was being used as a stash house for narcotics and illegal proceeds of the narcotics trafficking. With the prior unlawful weapons charges the judge granted a "no knock" warrant. It is not clear whether or not the police actually made notice prior to entry.
The boyfriend was involved with at least four other people that were being under surveillance as well. They were using multiple apartments/houses for their narcotics dealing. This was verified by video surveillance. This was not Mister Innocent, just catching a few Z's. This was a violent felon, unlawfully armed, in a place where he has been conducting his unlawful, felonious, criminal activities. Now, here's the question, was the "victim" involved in the criminal activity in that apartment? There is no indication she had knowledge of that activity. However, after reading the warrant, she would have to have been deaf, dumb and blind not to know what he was doing. Further, the boyfriend was identified in using two specific vehicle was transporting his drugs, one of which belonged to the "victim".
The boyfriend was involved with at least four other people that were being under surveillance as well. They were using multiple apartments/houses for their narcotics dealing. This was verified by video surveillance. This was not Mister Innocent, just catching a few Z's. This was a violent felon, unlawfully armed, in a place where he has been conducting his unlawful, felonious, criminal activities. Now, here's the question, was the "victim" involved in the criminal activity in that apartment? There is no indication she had knowledge of that activity. However, after reading the warrant, she would have to have been deaf, dumb and blind not to know what he was doing. Further, the boyfriend was identified in using two specific vehicle was transporting his drugs, one of which belonged to the "victim".