Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 12,161
- Reactions
- 21,510
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is really excellent news since Cargill is mostly challenging the procedural and chevron deference authority. If SCOTUS slams Cargill it will open the doors with case law to shut down, in long term, the alphabets future rule making... and in shorter term... have great impact on the other nonsense of late. IOW, frames & receivers, pistol braces, private party FFL requirements, et al.
Depending on the outcome of course, but them willing to hear the case is highly encouraging!
Good share! Quite apropos and a "bloodless constitutional revolution" is exactly what we've been experiencing since it's inception. Well phrased!Supreme Court poised to end āconstitutional revolutionā thatās marred US governance for 40 years
When Justice John Paul Stephens issued his 1984 opinion in Chevron U.S.A. v. National Resources Defense Council, he started what legal scholar Gary Lawson later called ānothing less than a bloodlesā¦nypost.com
If Cargill wins we all owe him a beer!Supreme Court poised to end āconstitutional revolutionā thatās marred US governance for 40 years
When Justice John Paul Stephens issued his 1984 opinion in Chevron U.S.A. v. National Resources Defense Council, he started what legal scholar Gary Lawson later called ānothing less than a bloodlesā¦nypost.com