- Messages
- 8,362
- Reactions
- 15,953
And the first amendment doesn't apply to anything digital... And the sky is made of skittles. Judges like that need to be disbarred. Political and personal opinion should have no place in a courtroom.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think even the idea of "common use is crazy" what if i want to own stuff that isnt common
In her ruling, Staton "cited congressional findings that semi-automatic rifles have a rate of fire, 300 to 500 rounds per minute, that makes them 'virtually undistinguishable' from machine guns, and that they are the 'weapons of choice' for gangs, hate groups, and 'mentally deranged persons bent on mass murder,'" the San Francisco Chronicle described.
I was in California for most of last week (oh the pain, the pain...) and I came out of California...Why is anyone surprised by this,its CALIFORNIA and nothing good comes out of California!!!
or suggestions.Weird, I didn't realize we had a Bill of Needs.
All that education and experience and still stupid as a rock.
I'm sick of feel good short sighted political rhetoric.
So much craziness by politically activist judges,
I was in California for most of last week (oh the pain, the pain...) and I came out of California...
The story linked in the OP says this is a Federal Judge.
"A federal judge in ..."
"U.S. District Judge ... "
That is an important distinction from a State judge, as it is much closer to those of us subject to the 9th Circuit.
Yes, you are right. It is a dangerous precedent if allowed to stand. And it is likely headed to the 9th Circus, where nothing is certain. But I can't imagine even they would be that duplicitous....