- Messages
- 38
- Reactions
- 92
The whole thing boils down to the government should have done their job to keep these people out of our country.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Something tells me your opinion wouldn't change even if they had channeled through legal points of entry and had been granted asylum prior to the incident...The whole thing boils down to the government should have done their job to keep these people out of our country.
If they come in the legal way is much different than coming in illegal.Something tells me your opinion wouldn't change even if they had channeled through legal points of entry and had been granted asylum prior to the incident...
I have to hope NOTMaybe this robbery victim will catch a break too.
This is what happens when the populace gets fed up with laws not being enforced, next is vigilantism...it won't end well.The jury could not agree to convict on any charge from murder down to reckless manslaughter or negligent homicide.
To me Vigilantism is like those people who fill pot holes because the gov in charge won't do it. I probably won't do it myself but I applaud and appreciate those who do.This is what happens when the populace gets fed up with laws not being enforced, next is vigilantism...it won't end well.
It's sad how accurate this statement is lol.You know, leasing all the southern border lands to Ukraine would be a brilliant solution. Then we could spend 61 billion dollars to secure our own border.
You were not there...Yes, they were here illegally. Does that justify their homicide? No. It doesn't seem they were threatening the rancher/murderer's life...
Isn't it funny to see all these people on this thread almost defending an illegal immigrant crossing onto an Americans property? It's always the people that are far away that give their opinions on what's right or wrong.You were not there...
Yes, that's great news except now his life may be in danger because of those who think he should have been thrown in jail. No way I'd feel safe there now. The state, county, and particularly the federal government owe him a YUGE amount of money for INTENTIONALLY putting him in that situation so he can move and/or hire full-time security for protection.The DA decided not to ask for another trial, so the rancher is free to go.
No, he put himself in the situation by initially committing the crime.The state, county, and particularly the federal government owe him a YUGE amount of money for INTENTIONALLY putting him in that situation