Attorney Andrew Branca critiques Attorney William Kirks legal analysis of the recent Roger Fortson tragedy. Im aware many people on this forum follow William Kirks channel for his legal coverage of current gun rights, laws etc. relative to the PNW region here.
Ive queued it up to where the good critique begins but its a long video if you want to dive into the details, otherwise the video is long winded and will take over an hour to fully watch to get all the details. If I understand right, the basic premise is Kirk claims he was "Was Executed for Exercising His Constitutional Rights" where Branca takes the position the shooting was justified under Florida law. At the queued up, Kirk position is he was legal to own the gun and not breaking any laws, Brancas response is thats not relevant to Floridas use of force laws. You can watch more from there if needed.
For the sake of discussion, if you had to go thru the system defending yourself, which attorney would you choose?
View: https://www.youtube.com/live/JEf63eHv0ac?si=OaNnMW8PNpMLRbxa&t=1721
Ive queued it up to where the good critique begins but its a long video if you want to dive into the details, otherwise the video is long winded and will take over an hour to fully watch to get all the details. If I understand right, the basic premise is Kirk claims he was "Was Executed for Exercising His Constitutional Rights" where Branca takes the position the shooting was justified under Florida law. At the queued up, Kirk position is he was legal to own the gun and not breaking any laws, Brancas response is thats not relevant to Floridas use of force laws. You can watch more from there if needed.
For the sake of discussion, if you had to go thru the system defending yourself, which attorney would you choose?