- Messages
- 605
- Reactions
- 460
The big trend is to submit your DNA only to disappointedly find out you are not related to anybody of great importance, but...
LE surreptitiously spoof the company, send in cold crime scene DNA to discover your DNA is a close [relatively, pun attended] match to your great uncle who happens to have raped, kidnapped, murdered, etc. one or several children or women or men.
The fine print leads you to believe your submitted DNA sample can only be accessed by by outsiders under judicial order...nope!
LE's routinely submit cold case 'DNA evidence' under fake names to those sites where they hope to find relatives, and then reap the listings and then scour the listings and then if they find your DNA shows great uncle, LE's initiate surveillance and then collect a surreptitious DNA sample from great uncle's coke can out of a trash bin and guess who gets arrested.
Did anybody hear me mention anything from the courts allowing the LE surveillance or allowing the LEs to do the initial testing, shade of violations of an individual's 4th amendment rights.
LE surreptitiously spoof the company, send in cold crime scene DNA to discover your DNA is a close [relatively, pun attended] match to your great uncle who happens to have raped, kidnapped, murdered, etc. one or several children or women or men.
The fine print leads you to believe your submitted DNA sample can only be accessed by by outsiders under judicial order...nope!
LE's routinely submit cold case 'DNA evidence' under fake names to those sites where they hope to find relatives, and then reap the listings and then scour the listings and then if they find your DNA shows great uncle, LE's initiate surveillance and then collect a surreptitious DNA sample from great uncle's coke can out of a trash bin and guess who gets arrested.
Did anybody hear me mention anything from the courts allowing the LE surveillance or allowing the LEs to do the initial testing, shade of violations of an individual's 4th amendment rights.