JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
6,072
Reactions
15,023
I was arguing with a tree hugger on another forum and put enough into this post that I thought I'd share it here:

The wolf introduction argument comes down to a large number of people in Portland and other large cities believing it's a wonderful thing for wolves to exist "out there somewhere". People who live "out there somewhere" typically live on land they and their families have owned, and farmed or ranched for generations. Most of these family operations are marginal in nature. They don't make a lot of money, typically about enough to get by on. They are being told by the city folk that they should pay a few thousand dollars a year so that those city folks can enjoy the idea of wolves living "out there somewhere". That payment comes in the form of lost livestock. Those losses of $5000 or $6000 in livestock in a particular year may mean that they have to give up their operation, and therefor, the land that has been in their families for generations. Do you like the idea of wolves living "out there somewhere" enough to pay a few hundred dollars a month in additional taxes? Do you think it's fair to expect someone else to bear that economic burden, even to the extent that they have to give up their way of life?

Oh yes, there are reimbursement programs. And if you can PROVE that your steer was killed by wolves you stand a chance of getting reimbursed...this time. But it's not enough that there are wolf tracks around the carcass, that there are wolf bite marks and obvious signs of wolf feeding on it. No, it COULD have died of natural causes and the wolves simply fed on it. It COULD have been killed by a bear and the wolves simply fed on it. What it boils down to is that the wolves pretty much have to be caught in the act. And the same people (the government) who are liable for a payment are the ones to decide. On top of that, the professional wolf advocates are constantly nipping at the heels of the government inspectors, questioning every claim that is granted.

Meanwhile the ranchers are vilified by those same professional wolf advocates as benefitting dishonestly from grazing contracts on public land and other government programs, and put in the same class as welfare queens. The misinformation and hatred expressed on many "environmentalist" forums for ranchers and farmers goes way beyond rationality. It's hatred fueled by jealousy and deep seated resentment for anyone who owns anything. It's the kind of thing I've heard from bicycling advocates in relation to my property. I shouldn't be allowed to cut trees or clear brush, or in any way alter my property because it's theirs to enjoy from the road as they ride by, and if I'm allowed to do those things it interferes with their enjoyment of my property. At no time do they volunteer to compensate me for the things I CAN'T do with my property. They are somehow partial owners without ever having to buy or risk anything.
 
On March 8, 2010 a young woman, Candice Berner, was killed by wolves near the village of Chignik Lake, Alaska. This report provides documentation of the investigation and conclusions related to that fatal attack. The physical and circumstantial evidence for a fatal wolf attack in this case is convincing. Other fatal wolf attacks have been documented in North America and throughout the world (Linnell et al. 2002, McNay 2002, McNay 2007), but the validity of investigator conclusions in wolf attacks have often been questioned because of a widespread impression that wolves do not act aggressively toward people. That impression is based on the observation that, at least during the twentieth century, there were no documented cases of healthy wolves killing or seriously injuring a person in North America (Mech 1998). This report documenting the Chignik Lake attack is significant because it includes DNA analysis that positively confirms wolf involvement.
 
You might add the wolves being imported are NOT native to the area. They are Canadian gray wolves which are MUCH larger than anything native to the PNW. They are the alpha preadators now.

Note: Not for the squeamish
Wolf | The Great White Hunter

The Cascades wolf was native to Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. I weighed 60 to 110 pounds. The imported Canadian gray wolves weigh 90 to 170 pounds. The imported wolves came from northern British Columbia and Alberta.
 

Upcoming Events

Centralia Gun Show
Centralia, WA
Klamath Falls gun show
Klamath Falls, OR
Oregon Arms Collectors April 2024 Gun Show
Portland, OR
Albany Gun Show
Albany, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top