Staff Member
Gold Lifetime
- Messages
- 21,764
- Reactions
- 62,952
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
True, and I'm still baffled how the NFA transfer tax even passed constitutional muster knowing they are taxing a right.Supposedly, in the eyes of the government, they are easier to conceal and that makes them more dangerous. BS.
NFA items were found to not be protected by the 2A in United States v. Miller 307 U.S. 174 (1939)True, and I'm still baffled how the NFA transfer tax even passed constitutional muster knowing they are taxing a right.
Removing braces makes them even shorter...but, ok.Supposedly, in the eyes of the government, they are easier to conceal and that makes them more dangerous. BS.
I kinda want an olive drab smoking jacket now.
NFA items were found to not be protected by the 2A in United States v. Miller 307 U.S. 174 (1939)
I think the true reason for outlawing braces is because a brace or stock makes the pistol into a more effective fighting gun. The 'conceal-ability' of the weapon is just a convenient argument.Removing braces makes them even shorter...but, ok.
But, then they are handguns so it's fine. Duh.Removing braces makes them even shorter...but, ok.