- Messages
- 18,744
- Reactions
- 45,457
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I use to own a 40sw but sold it because of ammo costs. I can shoot a lot more 9mm then 40, and a 9mm would still suck to get shot by.
Oh well, that's why I have a Sig 226 with both 9mm and 40 slides, I can change calibers just like my underwear!
I agree with many of the above statements about cost, quicker on target shots etc, but my biggest reason is that the general recoil is uncomfortable to me. I prefer the push of the 9MM or .45 to the snap of a .40.
Pointless article, it's all been written before.
Soft recoil? Sure.
Less cost for ammo? Yep.
Faster follow up shots? Who cares? The difference is minscule.
The .40 will always be more powerful - simple physics.
The .40 is the most used law enforcement cartridge in our country.
Pinky can write about the nine em em until he turns blue and it will not alter my opinion of it vs. the .40.
When the majority of law enforcement agencies in the good old U. S. of A. switch to the 9MM I'll ponder a change.
So, I suppose you carried a .38 Spcl. revolver until about 1985 or so? And you now carry a Glock?
PD are rarely at the forefront of tactics and equipment.
I attribute .40 S&W's success with departments across the country to be due to good salesmanship rather than any inherent advantage of the cartridge.
H
Then the Norma 10mm full house load turned out to be too much of a handful for the more dainty agents...
So, I suppose you carried a .38 Spcl. revolver until about 1985 or so? And you now carry a Glock.
PD are rarely at the forefront of tactics and equipment.
I attribute .40 S&W's success with departments across the country to be due to good salesmanship rather than any inherent advantage of the cartridge.