Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 517
- Reactions
- 450
The kind of training you are suggesting here involves shooting first at the first nuance of a threat?
I guess that might be true, if the only training a person does is in a game setting, but when I volunteered to do "Active Shooter" training with Washington County, we had training scenarios with simunitions (which hurt about the same as Airsoft, but also leave a little paint mark) that included people giving up/surrendering or not posing any further threat than they already had (e.g. putting the gun down when commanded or having it sitting just out of reach, like on the floor at their feet, etc), with the purpose being that the LEOs would NOT fire under those conditions (during which, BTW, as I was playing a dead victim, I got shot in the leg by someone who seemed to have a bit of an itchy trigger finger... that was odd. Only happened once though), so if training included both types of scenarios (i.e. shooting required and shooting should be avoided), then, wouldn't that be reasonable training? Seems to me that whether you use Simunitions or Airsoft, you could have similar training scenarios, and then the only difference would seem to be that simunitions also have the sound of shot fired. BTW, Threat Dynamics (http://www.threatdynamics.com/) also has both types of scenarios in their training for both LEO and Civilians. They mentioned one time that most of the time when they get civilians there, for example for a team building event, they tend to run mostly "shooting required" scenarios, as that's what they figure people came there for (shooting), but they can and do run both.