- Messages
- 14,902
- Reactions
- 27,422
Some are some aren't. Kind of like a 'built on Monday or Friday' kind of thing.My personal observation of the commemorative Winnies is that they are clacky, sloppy, and just not very well built.
Both of mine are pretty decent however the '66 100 year did not cycle properly and would kick loaded ammo out upon cycling. Also the finger lever did not close level with the tang and would not release the trigger safety without squeezing it fairly tightly.
I examined it and compared it to my 'working' '68 BB and discovered the carrier was not operating properly and seemed out of time.
Well, long story short I took it apart and discovered it was pretty 'rough' inside - along with the gold wash on the receiver had left 'flashing' on the edges and had never been trimmed off.
I carefully cleaned up the receiver and discovered the carrier spring was very rough at the point were it made contact with the carrier, so I took the spring out of my '68 BB and put it in the '66 and it cycled perfectly. I also had to 'adjust' the finger lever to properly align with the tang to reach the safety properly when closed.
I took the rough spring and carefully stoned the curvature spot where it makes contact with the carrier smooth and rounded like it should be, put it in the '68 BB and it cycled just fine as well.
It's just a guess but it's possible the Commemoratives may have not gotten any post build adjustments or tuning as it was probably surmised very few were ever going to be shot so maybe they were given a test fire, wrapped up and boxed for delivery.
I remember my '68 BB being a bit rough when I got it as well. I was told it had been fired twice as I was given a 1967 box of ammo that had two rounds missing when I bought it. I eventually took it apart and found it to be a bit rough inside as well, and gave everything a 'smoothing up' and now it works very well.