- Messages
- 287
- Reactions
- 128
Of course I would want the jury to nullify the law if I am innocent or charged with a crime that is bogus and unconstitutional (possession of firearms, drugs, etc.).
But on the other hand, I don't want a jury to convict me of a crime I am innocent of when the judge directs the jury to find me innocent because the law says I am.
In other words, "nullification" works both ways and I am less sure about the ability of a jury of my "peers" to make unbiased decisions than I am of the ability of someone (a judge) who is trained and experienced and knowledgeable in making relatively unbiased decisions. Juries are have an infamous reputation for being biased and easily swayed by those biases and emotional arguments by either the prosecution or defense - this is why the entity that has the better lawyer/legal team on their side often gets better results in a court of law.
As to what the website says, everyone can read and decide for themselves - but I would bet more than 50% will conclude that it says what they want it to say, not what it actually says, which goes to support my assertions about bias.
I hear what you're saying about feeling vulnerable to the ignorance of your own peers. But how does that ignorance come about? They say that "ignorance of the law is no excuse", yet according to the law in Oregon, the government - through public schools - are manufacturing the very ignorance that they say we have no excuse for. When I say "according to the law", what I mean is that Oregon "law" literally requires all public schools to provide "courses of instruction" on the Constitution for a minimum of 5 years (8th grade through 12th). If you graduated from high school in Oregon, then you know from your experience that the extent of what passes for Constitution education is about a semester of "government" class. Here's that law:
"336.057 Courses in Constitution and history of United States. In all public schools courses of instruction shall be given in the Constitution of the United States and in the history of the United States. These courses shall:
(1) Begin not later than the opening of the eighth grade and shall continue in grades 9 through 12.
(2) Be required in all public universities listed in ORS 352.002, except the Oregon Health and Science University, and in all state and local institutions that provide education for patients or inmates to an extent to be determined by the Superintendent of Public Instruction. [Formerly 336.230; 1977 c.226 §1; 1999 c.1023 §1; 2011 c.637 §114]"
ORS 336.057 has been on the books since 1923. Since the part about "history" only got added in 1977, we know that the original intent of this law originally required those 5 years of class time for the Constitution only. Now that standard applies to "history" as well. The case of Wilson v. Chancellor from 1976 backs this up, as well as Attorney General Opinion #7982 from 1980.
So this law is direct evidence that government schools are creating the very constitutional illiteracy that you say you prefer to avoid... by placing your interests in the hands of the very people who have destroyed the jury's capacity to make informed decisions about their determinations of the law through their verdicts. The source of the thing you fear is not your peers, but those you are trusting to educate your peers.
ORS 336.067 is similar:
"336.067 Topics given special emphasis in instruction. (1) In public schools special emphasis shall be given to instruction in:
(a) Honesty, morality, courtesy, obedience to law, respect for the national flag, the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Oregon, respect for parents and the home, the dignity and necessity of honest labor and other lessons that tend to promote and develop an upright and desirable citizenry.
(b) Respect for all humans, regardless of race, color, creed, national origin, religion, age, sex or disability.
(c) Acknowledgment of the dignity and worth of individuals and groups and their participative roles in society.
(d) Humane treatment of animals.
(e) The effects of tobacco, alcohol, drugs and controlled substances upon the human system.
(2) The Superintendent of Public Instruction shall prepare an outline with suggestions that will best accomplish the purpose of this section, and shall incorporate the outline in the courses of study for all public schools. [Formerly 336.240; 1975 c.531 §1; 1979 c.744 §13; 1993 c.45 §75; 2005 c.209 §22]"
Notice how Oregon's Legislators expressed that the goal of this law was to "promote and develop an upright and desirable citizenry" by requiring public schools to place "special emphasis" on (among other things) "obedience to law", the US Constitution AND the Oregon Constitution. My guess is that you got little if any exposure to the Oregon Constitution and likely no class time at all on how to accurately read the laws in order to be properly "obedient" to them. So the Legislature has passed laws to promote AND DEVELOP upright and desirable citizens (who will fill jury pools) and the public schools have made it a consistent "policy" to suppress this intent by denying future citizens of the time they need in class to learn the law for their own protection, as well as their communities. Your peers aren't the problem. They're the outcome of the problem.