Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 20,307
- Reactions
- 76,969
I was toying around with the idea of putting H-1 Alfa Hummer Suspension and 4 wheel steering under the 42, but the complexities and extra weight just make it more complex then it needs to be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I actually like the 4 BT better, it's lighter and can be made to make the same power with out the same fuel. Mine dynoed at 380 Hp and 670 F.P torque and gets around 17 miles per gallon despite the low gears in the axles. The new BT is set up exactly the same, but has the newer 16 valve head conversion, the intake was machined off and a new sheet metal manifold was fabbed up for it, should do even better! Best part is No Glow Plugs if using the industrial spec engines ( which both mine are) and the higher compression makes instant startups and turbo lag a non issue!
In a 1/2 - 1 ton pickup, you'd do better to go with a 3-53.Cummins made two different versions of the BT series both the 4 and the 6, the light duty versions were low compression glow plug engines, and the military/ industrial were high compression non glow plug engines. The 4 valve heads were later electronic engine "improvements" but they interchange with the older engines just fine. Mot all parts between all variants and both sizes interchange, which makes it real simple to set it up and tune it how you want it to run.
Another engine conversion to consider ( and I almost did this) is the 4-53 Detroit Diesel 2 stroke with Jake Brake! That's a pretty slick engine, and with the Jakes, would make for a real versatile power house! If you wanted a close ratio trans, one of the Clark 8 speeds, or even better, an Eaton twin shaft 8 speed would be pretty awesome, but HEAVY!
I think the drive axle on the 1-ton Toyota trucks were full floaters....seemed like it anyway.We had 6-V53 engine in the 44's, but the 52' had twin 6-71s which were much lower RPM but had a lot more low end power and were much easier to rebuild.
I will stick with my 6BT, but it needs some engine work and a new transmission. The truck is a one ton 4x4 dually with a std. cab and a 12' flatbed - i.e., a cab/chassis, so it will work for an RV (camper hauler) to get me near where I want to go when I retire, in comfort and serve as a base camp. Right now it serves fine as a farm truck.
I have some other things I want to do - put a diesel in the Toyota (and maybe a full floating axle on the rear so I can tow it easier), and lockers and winches on both trucks.
I think the drive axle on the 1-ton Toyota trucks were full floaters....seemed like it anyway.
Dean
`Is your Toyota a 1-ton, Heretic?Mine are not - '92 4x4. I want to have a rear axle with locking hubs so I can disengage them when towing. Full floating axles are stronger too since the drive shaft in the axle doesn't carry weight, only power.
`Is your Toyota a 1-ton, Heretic?
WARN still makes the hubs, and Six States and Dutchmans can make or modify a set of rear axles fir ya if needed ( for the extra length needed) IIRC, Chevy 3/4 ton axles are the same as Toyota. You could probably find a Chevy floating axle and have it converted for your Toyota pretty reasonably.
If any of you have, or know where one is, I would be interested in getting one of the last of the DDEC 453's for an up and coming project.
They used to say so, right on the tailgate, "1-ton".Not sure, but I know it doesn't have a full floating rear axle. It was the last gen before Tacoma/T100
I seem to recall that Japanese makers rated their small pickups/trucks/etc. as one tons so that they could get past some import restrictions. That doesn't mean they could haul one ton. My Dodge 3500 is a one ton and can easily haul that much, and probably again as much more.
They used to say so, right on the tailgate, "1-ton".
View attachment 363130
Pretty bold statement, if it weren't true.
When I worked for U-Haul, we had a carrier called "TM", which was based on a Toyota cab-chassis with a 10' box.
It was a heavy duty 1-ton with rear dualies.
I used to jokingly define "TM" as "Tiny Mover".
The old Chinook and Marlin motor homes were based on that chassis, as well.
Capacity for your truck should be listed on the tag on the door/sill.
Check what the rear GAWR and GVWR stats are. That should tell you.
Dean
Yeah and I thought my cummins was loud and obnoxiousCummins made two different versions of the BT series both the 4 and the 6, the light duty versions were low compression glow plug engines, and the military/ industrial were high compression non glow plug engines. The 4 valve heads were later electronic engine "improvements" but they interchange with the older engines just fine. Mot all parts between all variants and both sizes interchange, which makes it real simple to set it up and tune it how you want it to run.
Another engine conversion to consider ( and I almost did this) is the 4-53 Detroit Diesel 2 stroke with Jake Brake! That's a pretty slick engine, and with the Jakes, would make for a real versatile power house! If you wanted a close ratio trans, one of the Clark 8 speeds, or even better, an Eaton twin shaft 8 speed would be pretty awesome, but HEAVY!
Tony,I rented several U-Hauls where the truck cab was a Toyota. Great vehicle even though it was not that large. I rented one for the move up into the Washington State area so I took the minimal amount of stuff since we were living in an apartment. Once we found a house I flew back down to California e to supervise the move. My employeer paid to move our belongings up to Washington State.