Join the #1 community for gun owners of the Northwest
We believe the 2nd Amendment is best defended through grass-roots organization, education, and advocacy centered around individual gun owners. It is our mission to encourage, organize, and support these efforts throughout Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming.
It really is a fantastic caliber, and if it were more mainstream it would be cheaper to stockpile and shoot. So my vote will always be for 7.62x51 in a battle rifle.
7.62x54r. Pretty much the only reason I'd own one. But from the research I'd done when first looking to buy one, the 6.8SPC showed the best in comparisons.
- .45ACP with a high cap mag that will fit in the AR15 magwell. While pistol calibers suck, they are great fun. And the current 9mm conversions are just, well...9mm.
- Either/Both 6.8SPCII or 6.5Grendel, with a 30 rd. mag to match. You could get much more performance out of these, but then it wouldn't fit in the AR-15 platform (need more length). But currently, ammo is still close to $1/rd. If it became common, we could see the ammo drop. But, I don't like the weakening of the bolt head that 6.5G creates. The previous poster with the 6mmAR has a good thought.
It's a great overall calliber...the .223 it outdated. The 7.62x51 is a beast to lug around to try and carry enough bullets for a sustained firefight. 7.62x39 is OK at best...but the 6.8SPC takes the magazine capacity that the .223 provides and adds some "oomph" to it to reach out and still take down a target at 500 meters+.
The 6.8SPC is the rifle equivilant to the .40 S&W. The .40 bridges the gap between .45 and 9mm...while the 6.8 bridges the gap between .223 and 7.62.
If our Supporting Vendors don't have what you're looking for, use these links before making a purchase and we will receive a small percentage of the sale