We should not be arguing against more gun control. Instead we should be making the argument that we are defending the entire constitution. As supporters of the 2nd amendment, we shouldn't be arguing against gun control, instead we should be making an argument for the constitution. Anything different is to tacitly agree with the premise the constitution is open to interpretation. This is not what the founding fathers had in mind when they drafted the constitution or came up with the amendment process. In other words if you don't like what's in the constitution (or how it is written) then change it. Change it through the amendment process. But do not agree to the premise the constitution can be interpreted into (or contorted) it clearly does not say.