Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another shot to the pocket book of rural citizens. But it should tick off a few suburban progressive types too. Everyone that wakes up and smells what's cookin' is a potential vote shifting against invasive government.
After following the link I was amazed to read about the Oregon man given jail time for collecting rainwater! They own the elements now! Just wait for the new wind and sunlight tax coming soon. No more joy in a nice breeze on a bright sunny day I guess.
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/man-sentenced-30-days-catching-rain-water-own-property-enters-jail
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/man-sentenced-30-days-catching-rain-water-own-property-enters-jail
This guy didn't bother with the process and constructed three reservoirs upstream of neighbors who already had rights to that water.
The Bundy clan can dismiss the right of the government to regulate land use of public lands. This gets a lot of support and no legal action. Why can not the same thought process be applied to water rights, as regulated by government?
The Bundy clan can dismiss the right of the government to regulate land use of public lands. This gets a lot of support and no legal action. Why can not the same thought process be applied to water rights, as regulated by government?
But your resort was to the State, through litigation, not through the Fed who is controlled by the corrupt Chrony-Congress.Water rights may overseen by a government agency, but in most cases they are privately held.
My family owns property in southern Oregon that has in-stream water rights that were established in 1889.
We went through a situation in the 1980's where an individual upstream from us thought that he could divert water into a flood irrigation system to water his pastures, without an established water right. Whenever he did so, our pumps would run dry.
We approached him first as neighbors, and later through an attorney. Our ultimate recourse was to challenge his use through the OWRD and successfully shut him off.
Without the avenue of having a state agency in place to protect our senior water rights, we would have resorted to dynamite and lever actions to solve the issue Old West style.
E
But your resort was to the State, through litigation, not through the Fed who is controlled by the corrupt Chrony-Congress.
I have stories about how my water rights have hung by a thread for the past 40 years that would shiver the flesh from your bones!
The last resort of a free man should be that of The State. The first resort should be that of his spiritual dedication, and that includes the welfare of his neighbors.True, but in Oregon it is the state that oversees water rights on private and state la. As it should be IMO.
We have one guy downstream that has rights senior to ours (1876ish). Whenever he starts to struggle, we get notice to shut off.
E
There is a little more to that story than "just collecting rainwater".
E