Does I-1639 directly require that Oregon FFL's follow the same procedures for selling restricted firearms to WA residents as WA FFL's are required to do?Ask Oregon why they wont approve a rifle sale to a CA resident. Because its in violation of federal law and CA called Oregon up and said...stop, youre breaking Federal law. You need to forget about Washington RCWs, its 18 USC that applies here, Federal Law. OSP will be sued by Washington for approving rifle sales once the AG gets off of suing Trump and the US Navy.
Sheriff Atkins, whom we're suing in Federal Court, is retiring...so election won't matter much to him.
FYI - Sportsmans refused to honor our 1639 training certificate too. Until we talked to them and showed them the law, explained it for them. Most of the folks on the counters know very little about 1639, especially those in Oregon.
Or do you feel Oregon FFL's are required to follow the I-1639 law because the Feds require it as part of the FFL requirements?