WaPo admits gun control laws won't work. In print! Really!

[MrNatural]

This is HUGE! Pass the word!

Gun haters point to recent mass shooting and froth at the mouth demanding new anti-gun laws to stop such future massacres.

But, the Washington Post - that monument to antigun agenda-journalism - has admitted in print, in detail through its "fact checkers", that NONE of Obama's proposed gun control initiatives would have stopped those mass shootings!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...otings-would-have-been-prevented-by-gun-laws/

To repeat - THIS IS HUGE. Better save a copy of the WaPo page (I did!) before it gets "disappeared." You'll want to be able to send it to others in the future.

Read More

 

[Jamie6.5]

They're trying to make the case for a total ban on handguns, confiscation of "assault" weapons, and a federal registration scheme for the fudds that are left in possession of single shot rifles.

None of that half-baked obama crap.

 

[jim97701]

suggest you check your link, there is no story there but you can read the azz head comments from people that are against our gun rights.

 

[IronMonster]

Story came up fine for me by the link

 

[jim97701]

all I get are the headers with blank spaces where the story should be?

 

[IronMonster]

Dunno, I got it no problem.

 

[jim97701]

might just be a buggy site, finally loaded the story on about the 6th attempt. guess if it doesnt work keep trying LOL.

 

[Heywood]

Hint... When a lefty says this.
And
When a socialist says they do not like the affordable care act....I'll let you figure out the rest..

 

[Goosebrown]

suggest you check your link, there is no story there but you can read the azz head comments from people that are against our gun rights.

I checked it. It links just fine.

 

[jim97701]

It links fine on my tablet, must have been something funky with my PC. Thanks for posting it, it's nice to read something that's not all lies and bs. Although the comments afterwards kind of pizzed me off.

Like this jewel by JFSpack

"I would add creating a strict liability law that would seize the entire estate of anyone who allows their gun to be stolen, in order to cover the damage caused by the gun. Should the value of the estate exceed the damage, the excess would be returned to the original gun owner, as well as the weapon, if it is recovered, because I am fair like that."

 

[tkdguy]

I just sent this article to all the Oregon Reps and Senators and OFF. This is a good article if one was to read it totally.