US federal: ...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. As everyone knows, this was affirmed as an individual right applying to the States in McDonald v Chicago, 2010. WA state: SECTION 24 RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself, or the state, shall not be impaired... This was upheld by the WA Supreme Court in State v. Christopher William Sieyes, where the constitutionality of WA firearm laws was challenged, although frustratingly the Court was vague on the level of regulation that would pass scrutiny. Given both of those developments in the last six months, has anyone in Olympia asked Attorney General McKenna (allegedly a pro-2A Republican who has provided numerous gun related opinions in the past few years) for an analysis of which WA firearm laws may now be unconstitutional? It seems inconsistent that WA has onerous restrictions on items like full auto guns, suppressors and short barrel rifles when constitutionally our rights are equal or better than most states, and are not supposed to be impaired?! Are there any cases pending in WA on this topic?