Other State WA, Here ya go! US District Court finds Delaware "ghost gun" ban unconstitutional.

[Yarome]

Get on it!

Read More

 

[Stomper]

View attachment 1281379

Get on it!

Keep pulling on that loose thread, the entire brick house is starting to crumble!

 

[Yarome]

For those that prefer to read:

FPC VICTORY: Federal Judge Blocks Delaware Ban on Self-Built Firearm Possession, Home Manufacturing

Today, Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) announced that United States District Judge Maryellen Noreika issued an order enjoining Delaware’s bans on self-manufacturing and possession of home-built firearms in its Rigby v. Jennings lawsuit.

www.firearmspolicy.org

Noice!!!

 

[ilikegunspdx]

I think what we are seeing in this example and the recent TX examples possibly is that the gov. has gotten used to "pre-Bruen" thinking and using "modern examples" as their evidence. They seem to be slapping some type of "historical precedence" wording onto their defense language but have included zero "non-modern" historical evidence. And the judges are seeing right through that.

Imo after the Gov gets slapped down like this they will scour every historical record (I'm sure they are doing it now as we speak) to find some examples from the 1791ish period that they can use as evidence (likely the same ones the judge discovered in the Gomez ruling in TX).

So right now the Gov has no leg to stand on. It may be that even after they scour the historical record they still will have no leg to stand on. I think that will be true especially for things like mag bans where there is no similar historical record at all.

In short, life is good, and getting better!

 

[Yarome]

I think what we are seeing in this example and the recent TX examples possibly is that the gov. has gotten used to "pre-Bruen" thinking and using "modern examples" as their evidence. They seem to be slapping some type of "historical precedence" wording onto their defense language but have included zero "non-modern" historical evidence. And the judges are seeing right through that.

Imo after the Gov gets slapped down like this they will scour every historical record (I'm sure they are doing it now as we speak) to find some examples from the 1791ish period that they can use as evidence (likely the same ones the judge discovered in the Gomez ruling in TX).

So right now the Gov has no leg to stand on. It may be that even after they scour the historical record they still will have no leg to stand on. I think that will be true especially for things like mag bans where there is no similar historical record at all.

In short, life is good, and getting better!

Well... they did find limited standing in a select instance for one case... using previous prohibitions on firearm possession by slaves and american indians, for a time. It's not above the woke agenda (that supposedly fights against racial inequality and discrimination) to try and use discriminatory prohibitions imposed against minority groups... I guess.

Not that those temporary limited use arguments hold water anyway, but they DID try!