Violent car-jacking in front of anti-gun Justice Sotomayer's home

[billdeserthills]

SCOTUS Justice Sotomayor's armed guards shot a man today when the man allegedly tried to engage in a car jacking. Mark Smith Four Boxes Diner has the story.

View: https://youtu.be/Bbr_x-NI6YU?si=bP3N6UwPnzW8Q1s2

Read More

 

[ZA_Survivalist]

What's odd is, conservative judges didn't get any defense or "breaking news" when people online posted their addresses or places they/their family went to eat dinner and thus resulted in stalking and protesting as well as death threats.

What's odd is, with some of her beliefs.. those armed security guards should have simply maced the car jackers foot or sent social workers to ask him how his day was and why he was doing what he was doing then sent him on his way.. once again I see the privileged class having armed security while they demand the rest of us lowly civilians disarm because crime neeeeever happens and we live in a magical utopia.

 

[NeoBlackdog]

I reckon she's pretty happy there were some good guys with guns around.

 

[Andy54Hawken]

Something to consider here....

You can't use reason with people who are unreasonable.
Often...even when stumbling over the truth of the matter....
People pick themselves up and continue on the same path as if nothing happened.
Andy

 

[CamoDeafie]

Earlier thread on this https://www.northwestfirearms.com/t...ards-shoot-carjacker-outside-her-home.486366/

 

[orygun]

I only watched 3m18s of it, but he'd already repeated himself enough it could have been done in 1m30s!

I know I'm not the only one that finds irony in this incident. She's probably thinking, "If that guy didn't have a gun, I wouldn't need my Security Force."

Yeah, right.

 

[Cavedweller]

The perp sounds like a real genius.

Teen Shot Trying to Carjack Justice Sotomayor's Federal Bodyguards.

U.S. Marshals shot an 18-year-old on Friday after he allegedly attempted to carjack federal bodyguards stationed outside Supreme Court Justice Sonia

thenationalpulse.com

 

[Sxsnuf]

I guess this opens the door for the use of deadly force in the protection of private property? (Yes, I know the article said he threatened the marshalls with a weapon.)
Seems they're VERY concerned about the security of "gubmint lackeys", not so much about private citizen pee ons.

 

[TTSX]

We'll forget this ever happened by Thursday morning. Nothing will change. Keep on keeping on