Views on Gun Control - Sammy Gravano

[pizdous]

This is why we need to fight to keep our 2nd amendment. Good video.

Read More

 

[billdeserthills]

This is why we need to fight to keep our 2nd amendment. Good video.

Sure, up till 7:20, then he goes into his anti-hi cap mag gun hate--'who needs a 30 caliber'?

 

[MarshalChillN]

Sure, up till 7:20, then he goes into his anti-hi cap mag gun hate--'who needs a 30 caliber'?

Yeah, I was going along/agreeing with him UNTIL he started dissing on semi-autos as hunting rifles, bolt action pistols for self-defense, etc..
I really dont think he's very savvy on firearms....

 

[billdeserthills]

Yeah, I was going along/agreeing with him UNTIL he started dissing on semi-autos as hunting rifles, bolt action pistols for self-defense, etc..
I really dont think he's very savvy on firearms....

He reminds me ofJim Zumbo

 

[pizdous]

Sure, up till 7:20, then he goes into his anti-hi cap mag gun hate--'who needs a 30 caliber'?

Yeah thats the only part I didn't agree with at all. But still I think he made some good points.

 

[billdeserthills]

Yeah thats the only part I didn't agree with at all. But still I think he made some good points.

Fact is about 3 million people die in the US every year & guns kill about 1% of those people. Hammers & knives kill 3 times as many folks as AR-15's do

 

[Andy54Hawken]

While it is important to know what the 2nd Amendment says....

It is also important to know what it doesn't say such as :

"...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms , except for Arms of certain types , shall not be infringed."
Or
"...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms , but only Arms of a specific type and for specific purposes , shall not be infringed."

There is no exception or clause , in the 2A , for what Arms one can own or even the notion that one needs a reason to own Arms.
Arms by the way , means weapons and related accoutrements...
One of the many Arms to have been seized by the English at concord was a privately owned cannon.

So , to me at least , there is no question that word "Arms" in the 2nd Amendment covers a whole lot of ground , so to speak , and not just firearms or only certain types of firearms , or those suited for specific uses.
Andy

 

[pizdous]

Completely agree Andy

While it is important to know what the 2nd Amendment says....

It is also important to know what it doesn't say such as :

"...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms , except for Arms of certain types , shall not be infringed."
Or
"...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms , but only Arms of a specific type and for specific purposes , shall not be infringed."

There is no exception or clause , in the 2A , for what Arms one can own or even the notion that one needs a reason to own Arms.
Arms by the way , means weapons and related accoutrements...
One of the many Arms to have been seized by the English at concord was a privately owned cannon.

So , to me at least , there is no question that word "Arms" in the 2nd Amendment covers a whole lot of ground , so to speak , and not just firearms or only certain types of firearms , or those suited for specific uses.
Andy

 

[powersbj]

The amendment which is spectacularly clear with "shall not be infringed" and was specifically designed to arm the population with military firearms, is endlessly litigated with the main argument being what they think you need to hunt with... We need to take the narrative back. Wish I knew how.

 

[SonicBlue03]

Every time a judge rules against gun ownership, you have clearly identified another lawyer in a black dress that failed to study history.

 

[Certaindeaf]

Sure, up till 7:20, then he goes into his anti-hi cap mag gun hate--'who needs a 30 caliber'?

You're the kinda guy I rely on so I don't have to click. Thank you.