USA: HR-923 Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity

Discussion in 'Firearm Legislation & Activism' started by RicInOR, May 3, 2016.

  1. RicInOR

    Washington County
    I aim to misbehave Silver Supporter

    Likes Received:

    H.R.923 - Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2015
    Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2015

    Amends the federal criminal code to authorize a person who is not prohibited from possessing, transporting, shipping, or receiving a firearm under federal law, who is entitled and not prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm in his or her state of residence or who is carrying a valid state license or permit to carry a concealed weapon, and who is carrying a government-issued photographic identification document, to carry a concealed handgun (which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce, other than a machine gun or destructive device) in any state in accordance with the restrictions of that state.

    Provides that in a state that allows the issuing authority for licenses or permits to carry concealed firearms to impose restrictions on the carrying of firearms by individual license or permit holders, an individual carrying a concealed handgun under this Act shall be permitted to carry it according to the same terms authorized by an unrestricted license or permit issued by such state.

    Via GOA

    Urge Your Rep. to Cosponsor HR 923!

    The Representatives listed below have ALREADY cosponsored this bill and should be THANKED:
    Representative State District
    Rep Young, Don AK
    Rep Zinke, Ryan K. MT
    Rep Gosar, Paul A. AZ 4
    Rep Salmon, Matt AZ 5
    Rep Franks, Trent AZ 8
    Rep Bishop, Rob UT 1
    Rep LaMalfa, Doug CA 1

    All the rest of ours, NW, were not on the co-sponsor list. They want to hear from you.
    "So if your Congressman is NOT listed below, please call 202-225-3121 and urge him or her to cosponsor HR 923."
    boogerhook and The Nothing like this.
  2. boogerhook

    Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    stupid commerce clause even here ... wonder why? I understand that they couldn't create a federal law governing guns at schools without the commerce clause but for this ? And besides that clause remains questionable, because jurisdiction based on commerce is temporary, as in "while in transit". Once the gun hits the shelf of the dealer, federal jurisdiction is gone. Smarter people have reasonably elaborated here :
  3. Deebow

    Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    Some of us knew that the gay marriage debate was going to lead us down this road; the law of unintended consequences.

    States honor each others state issued driver's licenses and county/state issued marriage licenses, and in some cases hunting and fishing licenses, medical licenses, etc. so why not guns permits?

    Behold your utopia liberals. Bet they didn't bet on that.
    The Nothing likes this.
  4. PaulB47

    Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    Considering the people involved, why expect consistency or reason?

    "People do not expect to find chastity in a whorehouse. Why, then, do they expect to find honesty and humanity in government, a congeries of institutions whose modus operandi consists of lying, cheating, stealing, and if need be, murdering those who resist?"
    -- H.L. Mencken
    OutlawHoss likes this.

Share This Page