U.S. Army Unveils 'Revolutionary' XM25 Rifle in Afghanistan

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by Shadow, Nov 29, 2010.

  1. Shadow

    Shadow
    Conyers, Georgia, United States
    Member

    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. MrNiceGuy

    MrNiceGuy
    between springfield and shelbyville
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    674
    I think it's a good specialized weapon, but with it's large size, low round count, and explosive shells, I think it'd be a horrible weapon for engagements within ~50 yards.

    Most squads will probably have one, but I dont think it'd be a good weapon for every soldier to have.
     
  3. parsons_12b

    parsons_12b
    LaPine Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,114
    Likes Received:
    101
    Not sure I would want to carry the extra weight in combat
     
  4. ogre

    ogre
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,055
    Likes Received:
    2,258
    I'll bet the price per round is also 'Revolutionary.' That is fine with me if it works as described.
     
  5. HappyRoman

    HappyRoman
    Sherwood Forest
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    2,205
    Likes Received:
    149
    THANK YOU for the info..
     
  6. Father of four

    Father of four
    Portland, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,311
    Likes Received:
    1,699
    "is so sophisticated that soldiers are proficient users literally within minutes."

    O.k.... I would think something SOOOO sophisticated would take more then a few mere minutes to figure it out. :bluelaugh:
     
  7. Father of four

    Father of four
    Portland, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,311
    Likes Received:
    1,699
    "Once the trigger is pulled and the round leaves the barrel, a computer chip inside the projectile communicates exactly how far it has traveled, allowing for precise detonation behind or ahead of any target."

    I wonder how much those rounds cost? A few hundred per round?
     
  8. Father of four

    Father of four
    Portland, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,311
    Likes Received:
    1,699
  9. parallax

    parallax
    eugene, or-gun
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    833
    Likes Received:
    584
    Hey, they already made these back in 1997. I saw them at the movies. STARSHIP TROOPERS.
    famous quote;; your some kinda of big fat smart bug arent you.:laugh:
     
  10. jordanvraptor

    jordanvraptor
    Oregon City, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,693
    Likes Received:
    488
    I do not think it is a game changer but more like a smart M203. I can bet you that it will be considered an indirect fire weapon and require approval under the rules of engagement as such. If you just want to kill someone behind a wall or window, an AT4 or SMAW would get the job done better.

    The first time its used and some "civilians" get hurt it will require approval from higher to be used thereby eliminating the quick reaction advantage they built it for.
     
  11. clearconscience

    clearconscience
    Vancouver, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    6,766
    Likes Received:
    10,775
    I think that's a great gun, but only need one per unit or fighting group. Not a CQB weapon. Also can you imagine the legal problems this will give to the soldiers who use it and kill "innocent" terrorist.
     
  12. PosterGuy

    PosterGuy
    Hillsboro
    Member

    Messages:
    282
    Likes Received:
    15
    Looks like a decent weapon, but the quotes were laughable. I don't think it's "revolutionary" or "game changing". Its just an advanced m203 of sorts. That article made it sound like the weapon was delivered by Jesus himself.
     
  13. Artilleryman

    Artilleryman
    Originally from the central midwest but have reloc
    Active Member

    Messages:
    458
    Likes Received:
    78
    I vaguely recall seeing what must've been prototype versions of this at ft. sill back around '96 or so during some 'future arms' presentation. iirc they called it the "oiw", and had crew served variants called the "ociw" pr something like that...o's & w's anyway (don't remember what the acronyms stood for). hmm maybe it was something a bit different as I think those versions were a rifle and a smart gren launcher.. either way, the sales hype was pretty similar. It sure would be crap if every G.I. was stuck with one of these, but it would make a great special weapon, say one per squad or something along those lines...like a smart mortar or 203....I just never warmed up to the idea of an individual weapon having onboard electronics....murphy loves electronics...but time will tell...it does look promising
     
  14. CanCanCase

    CanCanCase
    Southern Oregon Coast
    Member

    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    1
    Seems the laser range-finding is nothing new, just the wireless comms in the round to talk back to the computer so it goes boom at the right time. Can't be too long before a scope-maker teams up with Barrett to make the round talk to the laser scope outside of Military development. (Kinda like the onboard computer built into the scopes of some of the .223 and .338 lapua sniper rifles we've been reading about to calc windage, etc.)

    Rules of engagement be damned... if a dirtbag is shooting at any soldier of the US, I'm all for anything new that goes boom and kills the dirtbags deader.

    -Case
     
  15. Markjz

    Markjz
    Longview, WA
    Member

    Messages:
    147
    Likes Received:
    20
    WTF is this? : | that is the most ridiculous looking weapon ever.. like it was designed by preschool girls hellokittygun.jpg

    hellokittygun.jpg
     
  16. MrNiceGuy

    MrNiceGuy
    between springfield and shelbyville
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,663
    Likes Received:
    674
    It does look like a b@stardized super soaker, and that laser/scope thing looks straight out of 1979....

    I think it's a great idea that we can make work with our level of technology, but it's not streamlined. Wait another 30 years and you'll see weapons with the same capability in a much smaller and more efficient package.
     
  17. MountainBear

    MountainBear
    Sweet Home, OR
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,787
    Likes Received:
    2,870
    Excellent "Who's Framing Roger Rabbit" reference...

    3966-21221.gif

    66864-21221.gif
     
  18. usmc

    usmc
    oregon
    Active Member

    Messages:
    231
    Likes Received:
    62
    WTF! hahaah lets fix something thats not broke, and oh yeah, lets tack on an extra 437,500,000 for us tax payers to pay for.the government is a damn joke. lets just get laser beam guns,or maybe some **** BOY weapons.ahhahaha ,if it cant see through woman's cloths i dont want it.:D:laugh:
     
  19. Silver Fox

    Silver Fox
    Puyallup, WA
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,187
    Likes Received:
    299
    Wow the best technology in weaponary and bunch of 19 year old @$$ clowns are packing these around?

    The timing couldn't be better. With all the problems with diplomat cables exposing our secrets and the N Korea 'stuff'..... I think we are flexing our muscles.

    SF-
     
  20. jordanvraptor

    jordanvraptor
    Oregon City, Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,693
    Likes Received:
    488
    The round does not talk back to the gun after launch. It knows how far to go before detonating via the laser range finder before it is fired. The fuse then counts the number of rotations it makes in the air to equal say 300 yards. If the rifling is 1 turn in 12 inches, then 900 rotations later it goes boom. Neat huh? :)
     

Share This Page