Gold Supporter
Bronze Supporter
- Messages
- 12,923
- Reactions
- 47,180
Mrs 3M and I have shield 9's and we a re both very happy with them. When we went shopping for her I decided that I would migrate all my pistols to the same line as hers so they would all function exactly the same so there would be no confusion ifor her n the event of an emergency. Not a factor for me, but I'm a gun guy. Plus it would simplify her training and lessen the possibility of an accidental discharge while she was learning.
After a LOT of shopping and testing we went with the M&P line. The grip fits her hand well and for me was my #2 choice (Glock was #1), ergonomics were as good as the others, but a big factor for her is that the M&P line requires little force to charge. Not a factor for me, but wimmen and their nails...
We have a full size M&P 9 for things that go bump in the night, a matching M&P 22 for practice, and each chose the Shield 9 as our carry pieces. Oddly, of all of them I shoot the Shields better and it seems to have less felt recoil than the full size 9. I think it may be the compact geometry of having the slide lower relative to the griip. Yes, I also pretty much standardized on 9mm as well to avoid confusion in emergencies. They also all have the optional frame safety to keep the battery of arms identical.
It's been mentioned that a subcompact pistol may not be your best option when a situation happens. For me,the Shield is plenty accurate for self defense distances, and I practice mag changes to mitigate the smaller capacity. The size of the Shield means that I can more easily conceal it so that if there is a situation I will at least be armed. If I need more than than 24 rounds (3 mags) to get out of trouble then I don't need a pistol I need the rifle that's always in whatever vehicle I'm driving.
After a LOT of shopping and testing we went with the M&P line. The grip fits her hand well and for me was my #2 choice (Glock was #1), ergonomics were as good as the others, but a big factor for her is that the M&P line requires little force to charge. Not a factor for me, but wimmen and their nails...
We have a full size M&P 9 for things that go bump in the night, a matching M&P 22 for practice, and each chose the Shield 9 as our carry pieces. Oddly, of all of them I shoot the Shields better and it seems to have less felt recoil than the full size 9. I think it may be the compact geometry of having the slide lower relative to the griip. Yes, I also pretty much standardized on 9mm as well to avoid confusion in emergencies. They also all have the optional frame safety to keep the battery of arms identical.
It's been mentioned that a subcompact pistol may not be your best option when a situation happens. For me,the Shield is plenty accurate for self defense distances, and I practice mag changes to mitigate the smaller capacity. The size of the Shield means that I can more easily conceal it so that if there is a situation I will at least be armed. If I need more than than 24 rounds (3 mags) to get out of trouble then I don't need a pistol I need the rifle that's always in whatever vehicle I'm driving.