Quantcast
  1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!

This is absolutely ridiculous..

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by usmc0311, Feb 23, 2009.

  1. usmc0311

    usmc0311 Portland Member

    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    0
  2. fingolfen

    fingolfen Oregon Member

    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    3
    It's an AP story - what do you expect?
     
  3. onearmedswordsman

    onearmedswordsman Hillsboro, OR Member

    Messages:
    363
    Likes Received:
    1
    I wish I could ask Gleason if he is tripping or what:

    1. An abuse victim is more likely than not abused by someone very well known to the victim. Posession of a firearm, let alone CCW will not be in question.
    2. An abuser will not be a law abiding CHL carrier. The abuser most likely does not have a CHL.
    3. What difference does it make? Abuser can still have a firearm w/o a CHL!
     
  4. WOFLLC

    WOFLLC Eugene New Member

    Messages:
    2
    Likes Received:
    0
  5. swoop

    swoop Milwaukie, Oregon Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,079
    Likes Received:
    281
    You know, before I got my CHL I did a test to see if a weapon could be concealed on my body. ' No Problem ' nuf said. :nuts: