Quantcast
  1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!

The anti gun male

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by xm193, May 20, 2011.

  1. xm193

    xm193 seatac Active Member

    Messages:
    235
    Likes Received:
    85
    Julia Gorin

    LET'S be honest. He's scared of the thing. That's understandable--so am I. But as a girl I have the luxury of being able to admit it. I don't have to masquerade squeamishness as grand principle-in the interest of mankind, no less.

    A man does. He has to say things like "One Taniqua Hall is one too many," as a New York radio talk show host did in referring to the 9-year old New York girl who was accidentally shot last year by her 12-year old cousin playing with his uncle's gun. But the truth is he desperately needs Taniqua Hall, just like he needs as many Columbines and Santees as can be mustered, until they spell an end to the Second Amendment. And not for the benefit of the masses, but for the benefit of his self-esteem.

    He often accuses men with guns of "compensating for something." The truth is quite the reverse. After all, how is he supposed to feel knowing there are men out there who aren't intimidated by the big bad inanimate villain? How is he to feel in the face of adolescent boys who have used the family gun effectively in defending the family from an armed intruder? So if he can't touch a gun, he doesn't want other men to be able to either. And to achieve his ends, he'll use the only weapon he knows how to manipulate: the law.

    Of course, sexual and psychological insecurities don't account for ALL men against guns. Certainly there must be some whose motives are pure, who perhaps do care so much as to tirelessly look for policy solutions to teenage void and aggressiveness, and to parent and teacher negligence. But for a potentially large underlying contributor, psycho-sexual inadequacy has gone unexplored and unacknowledged. It's one thing to not be comfortable with a firearm and therefore opt to not keep or bear one. But it's another to impose the same handicap onto others.

    People are suspicious of what they do not know-and not only does this man not know how to use a gun, he doesn't know the men who do, or the number of people who have successfully used one to defend themselves from injury or death. But he is better left in the dark; his life is hard enough knowing there are men out there who don't sit cross-legged. That they're able to handle a firearm instead of being handled by it would be too much to bear.

    Such a man is also best kept huddled in urban centers, where he feels safer than he might if thrown out on his own into a rural setting, in an isolated house on a quiet street where he would feel naked and helpless. Lacking the confidence that would permit him to be sequestered in sparseness, and lacking a gun, he finds comfort in the cloister of crowds.

    The very ownership of a gun for defense of home and family implies some assertiveness and a certain self-reliance. But if our man kept a gun in the house, and an intruder broke in and started attacking his wife in front of him, he wouldn't be able to later say, "He had a knife--there was nothing I could do!" Passively watching in horror while already trying to make peace with the violent act, scheduling a therapy session and forgiving the perpetrator before the attack is even finished wouldn't be the option it otherwise is.

    No. Better to emasculate all men. Because let's face it: He's a lover, not a fighter. And he doesn't want to get shot in case he has an affair with your wife.

    Of course, it wouldn't be completely honest not to admit that owning a firearm carries with it some risk to unintended targets. That's the tradeoff with a gun: The right to defend one's life and way of life isn't without peril to oneself. And the last thing this man wants to do is risk his life-if even to save it. For he is guided by a dread fear for his life, and has more confidence in almost anyone else's ability to protect him than his own, preferring to place himself at the mercy of the villain or in the sporadically competent hands of authorities (his line of defense consisting of locks, alarm systems, reasoning with the attacker, calling the police or, should fighting back occur to him, thrashing a heavy vase).

    In short, he is a man begging for subjugation. He longs for its promise of equality in helplessness. Because only when that strange, independent alpha breed of male is helpless along with him will he feel adequate. Indeed, his freedom lies in this other man's containment.
    http://www.jewishworldreview.com/julia/gorin030802.asp
     
    Last edited: May 20, 2011
  2. ZigZagZeke

    ZigZagZeke Eugene Silver Supporter Silver Supporter 2015 Volunteer

    Messages:
    2,709
    Likes Received:
    3,564
    Exactly what I've wanted to say for years.
     
  3. the puma

    the puma Oregon City Active Member

    Messages:
    175
    Likes Received:
    25
    I like it
     
  4. Uberdillo

    Uberdillo Oregon Active Member

    Messages:
    351
    Likes Received:
    128
    So...
    Anti-gun female = status quo

    Anti-gun male = no balls
    AND
    It's all fear based.

    So...we take all our close and even vaguely interested, semi-anti-no-much-ish-gun female friends and show them how to shoot, some catch on, and they end up either planting the seed with their boyfriends and/or husbands that either guns aren't so scary (a reasonable realization that because a woman doesn't have balls, and she's ok with it, balls must not necessarily be in the equation, machismo is conserved) or their women are crazy. Win-win since in each case, you either help bring someone over or you've helped elevate the level of stress in that relationship, potentially freeing up another female in the local population that's not entirely opposed to firearms. And that's how it all makes sense.
     
  5. coastal steelheader

    coastal steelheader Aberdeen Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    713
    About as well stated as it gets
     
  6. Redcap

    Redcap Lewis County, WA Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,990
    Likes Received:
    2,731
    The overwhelming majority of anti-gun males are weak, timid and untrustworthy.
     
  7. coastal steelheader

    coastal steelheader Aberdeen Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    713
    I think this sentence says it all about these types

    "So if he can't touch a gun, he doesn't want other men to be able to either. And to achieve his ends, he'll use the only weapon he knows how to manipulate: the law".
     
    Jamie6.5 and (deleted member) like this.
  8. MarkAd

    MarkAd Port Orchard Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,422
    Likes Received:
    617
    I would rather die trying to live, than live being afraid to die.
     
  9. U201494

    U201494 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    492
    "A fear of weapons is a sign of retarded sexual and emotional maturity."
    — Sigmund Freud

    I do not know if Freud actually said this, but near as I can tell it is true.
     
  10. Swedish K

    Swedish K SW Washington Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,943
    Likes Received:
    1,231
    I was thinking of this quote as I read the article - think there is a guy on FAL files that uses that quote as his signature line...
     
  11. drew

    drew OR Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,052
    Likes Received:
    970
    It's misattributed, too bad I like the quote.

    Sigmund Freud - Wikiquote
     
  12. U201494

    U201494 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    812
    Likes Received:
    492
    Thanks for fixing this! :thumbup: