Quantcast
  1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!

Tazers

Discussion in 'Knives & Other Discussion' started by Smoke It, Jun 21, 2011.

  1. Smoke It

    Smoke It northwest New Member

    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    43
    As we all know Tazers are available to the general public for a price.

    Question: If someone were to come at you with a tazer and you are a conceal carry holder would it be considered self defense .
     
  2. Cougfan2

    Cougfan2 Hillsboro, OR Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,792
    Likes Received:
    597
    I would consider someone coming at me with a Taser no different than someone coming at me with a ball bat or a knife and would respond accordingly. You can argue disparity of force I guess, but once someone tases you, you are at their mercy. I would not assume they would stop at tasing me.
     
  3. Ben Beckerich

    Ben Beckerich NW Oregon Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,911
    Likes Received:
    2,327
    i wouldn't call it as clear cut as my man coug argues above, but it definitely CAN be cause for deadly force, and for the reason he lists. it's no different than any other scenario you could come up with, in that it's going to depend entirely on the way the situation presents itself. does he have a full blown LE x26 Co2-propelled barb unit, or just one of those gay little contact units? the contact units hurt, but they DONT have the incapacitation potential of the Co2 units, and if that were the only weapon he had, i really don't think i could see a situation where it'd be appropriate to shoot.
     
  4. armedredneck

    armedredneck Oregon Active Member

    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    34
    I agree 100%. Not only do you not know if they'll stop tasing you, but what other intentions might they have once you're at their mercy? (I know, it's an obvious statement). But just think, are they after your gun? So they could then use that on you? Are they going to just continuously shock you? Are they going to incapacitate you and then beat or sexually assault you? (Some people are really sick in the head). Are they just after your wallet? As Coug suggested, you don't know what their deal is. I would not hesitate to consider that a threat of death or serious bodily harm.
     
    lowly monk and (deleted member) like this.
  5. armedredneck

    armedredneck Oregon Active Member

    Messages:
    273
    Likes Received:
    34
    You posted that at the exact same time I was writing my post. I didn't think about the contact units. That might be reason to give pause.
     
  6. Ben Beckerich

    Ben Beckerich NW Oregon Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,911
    Likes Received:
    2,327
    most of the "tasers" kids and criminals are running around with are contact only.. cheap, readily available. i don't think it's illegal to own an x26 as a non-LEO civilian, but good luck trying to get a hold of one.
     
  7. Cougfan2

    Cougfan2 Hillsboro, OR Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,792
    Likes Received:
    597
    I see your point, but I have had heart problems and getting tased might mean lights out for me. I'm not going to wait and see what happens. As far as determining what kind of unit he has, I'm not going to wait to find out either.

    You do make a good point that each situation is going to present itself differently. My decision on whether or not to employ deadly force would be different for someone 10 yards away than someone 10 feet away.

    I love armchair quarterbacking and that's not directed at you BKB, it's directed at me. :laugh:
     
  8. Gunner69

    Gunner69 Hillsboro Member

    Messages:
    304
    Likes Received:
    22
    You want that in Clear,Black or Yellow?? Easy as having a CC and a spare $1000 laying around.
     
  9. Ben Beckerich

    Ben Beckerich NW Oregon Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,911
    Likes Received:
    2,327
    wow.. guess i should have done a quick google search. you can get the older full size version for $499 and ships free
     
  10. Burt Gummer

    Burt Gummer Portland Completely Out of Ammo

    Messages:
    5,969
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    While Tasers were once pushed as a self defense only, non lethal device, they unfortunately de-evolved into being used as a compliance and torture device.
     
    lowly monk and (deleted member) like this.
  11. Ben Beckerich

    Ben Beckerich NW Oregon Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,911
    Likes Received:
    2,327
    agreed. it's BS. i've been tased (training, i'm not a crook), and it's truly indescribable pain. i opted for a full 5 seconds, and with optimal placement from left shoulder to right kidney... wanted to know what somebody shot on the street gets. cops have to get tased to get taser certified, at least in some, if not all, agencies... but i swear it's different arm-locked with 6 other cops. also, they're only required, as far as i've seen, to take a 2 second zap. a deployed taser lasts 5 seconds minimum, longer at the discretion of the user, and with good placement across the torso, it's 5 seconds in hello.

    and policies within every agency i've had anything to do with is that the taser is basically one step above a shove on the use-of-force continuum... less than the ASP, less than pepper, less than a headlock, tackle, choke-hold, arm-bar, whatever, and etc, etc. in other words- these officers are being trained to tase BEFORE using any of these other less painful techniques. passive resistance is perfectly taseable. stand still when told to get on the ground, you'll be tased. stay on your knees with your hands in the air because you're terrified of being SHOT because you have a firearm on your hip, you'll be tased.

    i can't imagine what the future holds, when we're all linked to a grid via implants/etc. i'm sure SCOTUS will be A-OK with officers using remote-control pain compliance transmitters on anybody who gets "out of line."
     
    lowly monk and (deleted member) like this.
  12. MrNiceGuy

    MrNiceGuy between springfield and shelbyville Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,665
    Likes Received:
    669
    it's better to be judged by 12.......

    I'm more worried about the loss of my life than the possible repercussions for saving my own life.
     
    lowly monk and (deleted member) like this.
  13. PlayboyPenguin

    PlayboyPenguin Pacific Northwest Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    4,833
    Likes Received:
    1,742
    I have been tased twice in my life. Once was in training and the other was when a "friend" thought it would be funny to taser me from behind at a party. I will have to disagree that the contact ones do no more than just sting. It knocked me off my feet and I am over 200lbs. Therefore I would indeed feel justified in using my firearm to defend myself from a stranger attacking me with a taser.
     
  14. lowly monk

    lowly monk Beaverton, Oregon. Just a guy. Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    1,229
    Likes Received:
    330
    Yes.
     
  15. jordanvraptor

    jordanvraptor Oregon City, Oregon Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,665
    Likes Received:
    360
    Back in my misspent youth I was a portland cop for about a year. We didn't have tasers at the time and it wasn't really considered cool to use pepper or the asp. You got in there and wrestled them to the ground and cuffed them. Preferably with other officers. :) I see all these tasings and even some shootings which make me think "doesn't anyone know how to fight anymore...?" :(

    On the flip side, I think the reason for the increased use of tasers is because it is easy to use, its not visually upsetting to witnesses as the guy goes stiff and falls down, and, last but not least, when officers get hurt, it costs the dept money. Workman's comp, insurance, health care etc and the officer just not wanting to get hurt has motivated departments to lessen the penalty for using a taser versus say an asp. Getting in there and grabbing something seems almost passe these days... :(

    Anyway, thats my rant on use of force, I've been there done that but it was so long ago I may not understand the situation fully anymore so I concede to those current officers who have more recent information.

    As to the OP's question. Given its potential to leave me helpless, I consider it potential deadly force or a disparity of force situation and would use deadly force.
     
    Burt Gummer, Riot, lowly monk and 3 others like this.