Syria may be about to pop

[Goosebrown]

That, my friends, is what is commonly known as a "knee jerk reaction."

No that is a long term response from civilized nations. Use gas get attacked. This should follow as Day follows night. It is and should be the norm and not the exception.

 

[Who The F R U]

Frankly, I don't care who was "winning". When chemical weapons (gas, biological, etc.) are used, the gloves come off. I trust our side over that of anyone else. We have plenty of oil in US and Canada, so don't hand me that "no blood for oil" garbage. I want the US to have the upper hand. We need to take it and use it wisely.

Peace through strength and superior firepower.

Call it "gunboat diplomacy" if you like. We generally use our power judiciously. Putin and the Arab Republics, not so much.

Obviously you have never been oversea's and don't have A clue as to what is going on in the middle east. Or you just aren't old enough to know about these things.


Chemicals seized at Turkey's Syria border raise questions

2 Turkish Parliament Members: Turkey Provided Chemical Weapons for Syrian Terrorist Attack | Washington's Blog

Reports claim Al Nusrah Front members in Turkey were planning sarin gas attacks | FDD's Long War Journal

So when somebody bombs a chemical weapons factory they should be held accountable for the release of chemical weapons ?
kill your tv................................................................

What did the Russians + Bashar do when they attacked ISIS.
They hit the ISIS Depot's.

And now we blame them for the "Chemical Attack "
They didn't sign the Geneva convention WE DID so who gives a F even if it was them .'
WHICH IT WASN'T..

 

[USMC-03]

There isn't incoming fire though, not at us.

I don't believe I've taken the position that Americans where or are directly in the line of fire within Syria. That's not my point.

 

[Goosebrown]

The problem isn't so much the why, it's that they haven't provided any compelling evidence as to who.

Without a doubt. In every case on Syria it was the Syrian government.

Tinfoil to believe otherwise. It takes a special person to disregard evidence, intent, history and ability to prolong a lunatic conspiracy theory.

 

[raftman]

I hope you get that figured out it sounds like a problem. Hope you get past it.

That's your argument? Essentially "nuh uh, that's you!"? Your position on this is even less respectable now. Leave this to the adults.

 

[raftman]

Without a doubt. In every case on Syria it was the Syrian government.

Tinfoil to believe otherwise. It takes a special person to disregard evidence, intent, history and ability to prolong a lunatic conspiracy theory.

How's this for history and intent?

 

[Who The F R U]

I said Kill your tv for those kind of drone's.

 

[Cavedweller]

Without a doubt. In every case on Syria it was the Syrian government.

Tinfoil to believe otherwise. It takes a special person to disregard evidence, intent, history and ability to prolong a lunatic conspiracy theory.

So, when you see video of the white helmets supposedly running into an area where chemical weapons have been used to rescue "victims," and nothing happens to them, you don't consider that evidence that something fishy is going on? Who you gonna believe, the jihadis or your own eyes?

 

[Who The F R U]

 

[Who The F R U]

Unless you know about this STFU..............

 

[Kruel J]

Thread closed.