JavaScript is disabled
Our website requires JavaScript to function properly. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser settings before proceeding.
Messages
3,035
Reactions
6,452

The remanding of the Massachusetts case signals that the high court is eager to see state laws correspond to the new Bruen standard established this summer. The Supreme Court has ordered the revisitation in other gun-related cases related to magazine limits , AR-15 bans, and open carry permitting .


"This just the first of a number of cases working up to the Court," tweeted Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University law professor.

"The state refuses to make exceptions for such non-violent misdemeanors, even when the individual complied with its own state law in securing a license to carry. Those are bad facts for a new challenge in the post-Bruen world," Turley added.
All I keep seeing is more reasons to be constitutional carry nation wide.

I mean we have to hop thru hoops and training/fees while criminals just carry regardless, so why hamstring ourselves?
 
Yet the Massachusetts House just passed the most nasty laws against legal gun owners Mass has ever seen.
A legally licensed gun owner needs permission from a public and a private business or person to carry on their property meaning most places will be off limits once the Senate in Boston votes it in. This is just ONE of the items in a long list in this law.
 

Upcoming Events

Tillamook Gun & Knife Show
Tillamook, OR
"The Original" Kalispell Gun Show
Kalispell, MT
Teen Rifle 1 Class
Springfield, OR
Kids Firearm Safety 2 Class
Springfield, OR

New Resource Reviews

New Classified Ads

Back Top