- Messages
- 3,954
- Reactions
- 5,308
A major study by 3 esteemed PhD's, together with 2 MD's, has concluded that 83% of the gun deaths in the United States could be easily eliminated, by simply passing 3 new gun laws. They are:
1) Mandatory background checks on all gun sales
2) Mandatory background checks on all ammunition sales
3) Compulsory registration of all privately owned firearms with the government.
Once all of the above has been done, these highly educated and learned people state the gun violence in America will shrink to a small fraction of what it is currently, with the lives of 83% of the people currently being killed by guns being saved.
Does it not make sense to implement all of these laws, when they would reduce gun deaths so dramatically?? What do you think of the logic they are using?
The authors of the study are:
Dr Bindu Kalesan, PhD, Department of Medicine, Boston University
Matthew E Mobily, MD, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
Olivia Keiser, PhD, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
Jeffrey A Fagan, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University
Sandro Galea, MD, School of Public Health, Boston University
Here is a link to the study, which was published in the Lancet:
<broken link removed>
Just pass these 3 simple laws, and countless thousands of lives will be saved!!! Do you think that this is too good to be true? What if all of these laws are past, and gun deaths don't plument?? What then? A study that more gun controls are needed?
It really looks like the movement to require background checks on ammo is growing. As well as demands for mandatory gun registration.
.
1) Mandatory background checks on all gun sales
2) Mandatory background checks on all ammunition sales
3) Compulsory registration of all privately owned firearms with the government.
Once all of the above has been done, these highly educated and learned people state the gun violence in America will shrink to a small fraction of what it is currently, with the lives of 83% of the people currently being killed by guns being saved.
Does it not make sense to implement all of these laws, when they would reduce gun deaths so dramatically?? What do you think of the logic they are using?
The authors of the study are:
Dr Bindu Kalesan, PhD, Department of Medicine, Boston University
Matthew E Mobily, MD, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University
Olivia Keiser, PhD, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland
Jeffrey A Fagan, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University
Sandro Galea, MD, School of Public Health, Boston University
Here is a link to the study, which was published in the Lancet:
<broken link removed>
Just pass these 3 simple laws, and countless thousands of lives will be saved!!! Do you think that this is too good to be true? What if all of these laws are past, and gun deaths don't plument?? What then? A study that more gun controls are needed?
It really looks like the movement to require background checks on ammo is growing. As well as demands for mandatory gun registration.
.