Stolen guns = no background checks!

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by Dave Workman, Mar 15, 2015.

  1. Dave Workman

    Dave Workman
    Western Washington
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,239
    Likes Received:
    2,417
    Well....DUH!


    Police reports show how Evergreen State gun control backers get it wrong

    Following the assassination of Julius Caesar on this date in 44 B.C., the people of Rome didn’t ban knives, but today’s anti-gunners push legislation like Initiative 594, requiring so-called “universal background checks,” arguing that it will prevent criminals and crazy people from getting guns, when a report yesterday on KOMO underscored why that’s wishful thinking at best.


    http://www.examiner.com/article/pol...rgreen-state-gun-control-backers-get-it-wrong
     
  2. CWOUSCG

    CWOUSCG Member

    Messages:
    60
    Likes Received:
    95
    Good article. I was hoping Stonel Guns was a gun shop or manufacturer though. :D
     
    Brutus57 and GunnyG like this.
  3. nehalemguy

    nehalemguy
    Vernonia
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    440
    Likes Received:
    518
    Me too!!!

    Considering that he's a guy who writes for a living, you would think.....:D

    E
     
    GunnyG and CWOUSCG like this.
  4. B5Ben

    B5Ben
    Boise
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,163
    Likes Received:
    716
    That would only work if they only sold components or 80% items.
     
  5. boogerhook

    boogerhook
    Seattle
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    1,244
    good article (small typo, I believe "heart" should be "heard")
     
  6. 3MTA3

    3MTA3
    DMZ between Liberty and Tyranny
    Behind Enemy Lines Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    2,774
    Likes Received:
    6,748
    They should make it a law that when you steal a gun, you need to get a background check before you remove it from the victims premises...
     
    Slobray, Dyjital, Brutus57 and 3 others like this.
  7. boogerhook

    boogerhook
    Seattle
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,167
    Likes Received:
    1,244
    you are pointing out the obvious, it's common sense
     
    IronMonster likes this.
  8. ZA_Survivalist

    ZA_Survivalist
    Oregon
    AK's all day.

    Messages:
    4,720
    Likes Received:
    5,948
    Then they'll just push for mandatory lock up/safe laws..

    I would if I had kids, and I lock things up when I leave for the day.. But if a criminal wants something, they'll almost always find a way to get it.
     
    Slobray likes this.
  9. PiratePast40

    PiratePast40
    Willamette Valley
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,218
    Likes Received:
    2,395
    Unfortunately, I'm sure it'll be coming to us via a house or senate bill very soon. :mad:
     
  10. ThePhonMan

    ThePhonMan
    Spokanistan
    Gold Supporter Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    269
    Likes Received:
    391
    Great article Dave and the comments from the I-594 “designated responder” are very interesting.

    I guess restricting every law abiding citizen with no appreciable positive outcome is all I-594 was trying to accomplish since even it’s most strident supporters agree it wasn’t intended to stop criminals.

    Perhaps it’s time we require that all new laws must pass the Hippocratic Oath: First, do no harm.
     
    meener777 and boogerhook like this.
  11. Dave Workman

    Dave Workman
    Western Washington
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,239
    Likes Received:
    2,417
    I haven't seen any "strident supporter" of I-594 agree that it wasn't intended to stop criminals. I've heard their rhetoric about keeping guns out of the wrong hands.
    It's all bushwa, of course, but it lets them dance around the fact that they've bought an election that passed an unenforceable, and perhaps unconstitutional piece of legislation.
     

Share This Page