- Messages
- 3,924
- Reactions
- 2,827
Good shoot.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well it was a party.As long as they weren't out in the streets smashing cars.WTF,huh? I mean come on,a freekin party OH NO!
Now,as far as them being stupid enough to walk over to his house,that wasn't real bright.But they were drunk and fearless.
If you are going to yell at 10 kids from your drive,why not have a shotgun handy while your outside? Not pointing it at them,just kinda leaning on it,like you just got done cleaning it. (I always clean my guns at 2AM BTW)
Maybe they would have just stayed on their side of the road.
If you're gunna yell at drunks,they will probably come visit you.
But what's this gang mentality? We would send one guy to talk to the neighbors.Not let the whole party go smash the guy. Probably real lucky he had the gun. Could have been some curb stompin'
Then the suing parents would be saying 'My Bobby would never do that,he's a sweet,gentle boy...'
Good shoot.
Wow, good find ereezy503!. the big picture is starting to become a little more in focus. drug addicted parents, of feral kids who are out of control. Who want to blame the old man next door for there little monsters. If there is a defense fund needed for this old guy, I'm in. I am pretty sure the old guy lives at 2345 6th street springfield,its a brown house, and the house where the girl lives and the loud party was at, is directly across the street ,its a blue house. ( as per KVAL news links)Here is the Mom of one of the "Innocent Children" Busted! Mugshots - The largest Arrest and Mugshot Database in the world In a comment section on the news story she claims that the scratches on her sons body and hands are not from fighting, but from getting thrown across the street by a 9mm bullet. So when she is not posing for mugshots, she is watching Bruce Willis Movies.
I wasn't there and I don't know what really happened.... but it doesn't sound like deadly force was something that had to be used. If the guy saw a bunch of punks coming towards him... he could have ran back inside and locked the door as he called 911 or something. Using deadly force is your LAST resort and you have to be able to prove you had no choice, and deadly force had to be used. This reminds me of the guy who shot at the guys who stole some iPhones lol.
What if he's crippled, or even just old and hella slow?
Guns as a "last resort" is a concept I don't really understand. Is the implication that you should have tried other levels of force before, any time guns come out? If so, that's a stupid rule... there are plenty of situations that warrant guns coming out first. Being immediately faced with armed and/or many attackers who apparently mean to do you serious harm- gun's comin' out.
If the guy saw a bunch of punks coming towards him... he could have ran back inside and locked the door as he called 911 or something.
No.
Duty.
To.
Retreat.
They were the aggressors by setting foot on his property. A senior, alone, 2 AM. Assuming that they moved in a pack, say 4 or more, then that is clear disparity of force. The man, as defender, could have had his gun out and aimed the moment they crossed his property line.
Edit; waiting on an actual news story to form my opinion though. Could have been GOM syndrome.
The whole thing could have been avoided by calling the police and letting them do their job. ...