1. Sign up now and join over 35,000 northwest gun owners. It's quick, easy, and 100% free!
  2. We're giving away over $1,000 in prizes this month in the Northwest Firearms Winter Giveaway!
    Dismiss Notice

Springfield Armory Ultra Compact or EMP? Help Please

Discussion in 'Handgun Discussion' started by NavyBob, Jun 4, 2013.

  1. NavyBob

    NavyBob michigan Active Member

    Likes Received:
    I was all set to pick up a pristine LNIB Ultra Compact in 9mm and today I paid a visit to one of my LGS. They had a nice selection of Springfield Everything, but I focused on the EMP in 9mm because I wanted an Ultra Compact.

    From what I was told by the salesperson, Springfield dropped the Ultra Compact in 9mm, replacing it with the EMP because the Ultra was plagued with feeding problems.

    The EMP is a bit smaller than the Ultra Compact. Now I really like the Ultra, but if the EMP is better, than that's the way I want to go. For my taste, I love the way the Ultra looks and the one I'm looking at is made in the US, not Brazil.

    Is the Ultra a feeding nightmare? Is the EMP a superior way to go?
  2. PuddleMonkey

    PuddleMonkey Vancouver, WA Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    I loved my EMP. Many of those ultra compacts did have issues awhile back.
  3. iamme

    iamme Lane County Well-Known Member

    Likes Received:
    The ultra- whether in 9mm or 45acp- can have teething issues due to the short slide travel. The EMP was redesigned around the 9mm/40sw to have a gun that is a slimmed down 1911, uses a good amount of 1911 parts, but will run these rounds better and offer better concealment. The only real plus to the UC is it's a true 1911- total parts swapability.