Smith & Wesson rejects gun 'microstamping'

Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by ATCclears, Jan 24, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ATCclears

    ATCclears
    North of Seattle
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    3,314
    Likes Received:
    5,183
    Smith & Wesson rejects gun 'microstamping' | HeraldNet.com - Nation/World

    Gun manufacturer Smith & Wesson refused Thursday to comply with California's controversial "microstamping" law, causing more of its products to fall off the state's permissible firearms list and be ineligible for sale.

    On its website, Smith & Wesson criticized Assembly Bill 1471, which requires new or redesigned semiautomatic weapons to carry microstamping technology, imprinting its make, model and serial number onto shell casings when a bullet is fired.

    Though the law was passed in 2007, language in the legislation stipulated it would go into effect when the necessary technology was widely available. It was not enacted until May 2013.

    Critics argue that the technology is flawed. Smith & Wesson said "a number of studies have indicated that microstamping is unreliable, serves no safety purpose, is cost prohibitive and, most importantly, is not proven to aid in preventing or solving crimes."

    "Smith & Wesson does not and will not include microstamping in its firearms," the firm said. "The microstamping mandate and the company's unwillingness to adopt this so-called technology will result in a diminishing number of Smith & Wesson semiautomatic pistols available for purchase by California residents."

    The company is not the first to take such action. The National Shooting Sports Foundation — which has sued the state over the law — said gun manufacturer Sturm, Ruger & Co. would also allow its products to fall off California's list of guns allowable for sale.

    "We are working hard to serve our customers in California and will do all we can to fight this draconian law," read a Ruger statement posted on the foundation's website.

    When the bill was passed in 2007, dozens of police chiefs, public officials and anti-violence groups voiced support, saying that it would help police more easily trace bullets and solve crimes. The National Rifle Association opposed the measure, along with other gun rights groups and manufacturers, including Smith & Wesson.

    James Debney, Smith & Wesson's president and CEO, said Thursday that his company's fight against the measure was ongoing.

    "We will continue to work with the NRA and the NSSF to oppose this poorly conceived law," he said.
     
  2. BillM

    BillM
    Amity OR
    Bronze Supporter Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    1,142
    Likes Received:
    669
    In order for micro-stamping to work, a program of gun registration must be in place. Having
    a piece of brass with a stamp on it is of no use if it can't be traced to the owner of the gun.

    Registration is the first step toward confiscation, as we are now seeing in New York and
    California.

    Personally--I will boycott any manufacturer that complies with California's micro-stamping
    mandate.
     
    Rmacleery and (deleted member) like this.
  3. rufus

    rufus
    State of Jefferson
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,585
    Likes Received:
    939
    Micro-stamping is a fantasy dreamt up by anti-gun tyrants. Its purpose is not to "solve crime" but to make compliance almost impossible. Ta-da, common sense gun control that some liberal judge will rule as not infringing. In other words, no guns.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page