Shouldering SB15 = SBR. New ATF ruling

Discussion in 'General Firearm Discussion' started by del_and_bones, Dec 26, 2014.

  1. del_and_bones

    del_and_bones
    Anchorage, AK
    Physics Pirate

    Messages:
    312
    Likes Received:
    108
    Just FYI: It appears that shouldering the Sig Brace turns a pistol into a SBR.

    Link
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Dec 26, 2014
  2. IronMonster

    IronMonster
    Free Idaho!
    Opinionated Member Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    4,791
    Likes Received:
    8,691
  3. Koda

    Koda
    Oregon
    Well-Known Member 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    2,990
    Likes Received:
    4,881
    does it go back to being a pistol after its unshouldered....?o_O
     
    mjbskwim, Stomper and Sgt Nambu like this.
  4. Joe13

    Joe13
    NW of Vancouver
    Opinionated & Blunt Silver Supporter Bronze Supporter 2015 Volunteer 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    8,033
    Likes Received:
    15,285
    So just dont get caught doin it...
     
    biggie24420 and mjbskwim like this.
  5. 308

    308
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    3,930
    Likes Received:
    9,322
    Those youtube guys better lose the videos then :D
     
    Riot and Sgt Nambu like this.
  6. The Heretic

    The Heretic
    Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,938
    Likes Received:
    9,227
    Only if they did it after the new letter came out.

    This should be interesting.

    I had a feeling that somebody in gov would put their foot down on this, and apparently they are trying to. What I expected was a new law, not a contradiction like this.

    It isn't a big deal to me at this point, because I don't have one (yes, I know - it affects everyone in general) and I am a fan of bullpups instead of SBRs. My most likely use of an AR pistol as a rifle would be to put a legal barrel on it and a shoulder stock, converting it back and forth. But since DT is going to be making the SBR, I have changed my plans and I will go with the MDR bullpup instead.

    Just the same, as I said, this will be interesting to see how it plays out. I would not be surprised to see SIG to go to court over this.
     
  7. jluck

    jluck
    Really,Really, Close to Newport Oregon 97365
    Voted #1 Member

    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    1,210
    Has there been a actual ruling document or just this letter of one man's opinion?
     
  8. The Heretic

    The Heretic
    Oregon
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,938
    Likes Received:
    9,227
    When the BATF issues such a letter, it is considered a ruling that has the force of law.

    Question is, what happens when they have two different such rulings that seem to contradict each other?

    Like I said, I anticipate a court hearing.
     
  9. B5Ben

    B5Ben
    Boise
    Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,214
    Likes Received:
    794
    I doubt SIG themselves will be in court over this. As described in the latest letter, it's when used as a shoulder stock (and not in compliance with manufacturer directions as a wrist support) that makes it an SBR. When used as directed by SIG its not an issue and is ok. It's just when shouldered that it's in violation per the latest ruling.
     
    Dyjital likes this.
  10. IronMonster

    IronMonster
    Free Idaho!
    Opinionated Member Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    4,791
    Likes Received:
    8,691
    I dont buy that, It is an opinion issued by a single representative. A case like this where there are conflicting opinion letters shows that quite well. Until someone is charged and a president set we are all just running scared and just hope that we are not the one made an example out of. I can quote the letter that clearly states that misusing the SIG brace does not turn it into a NFA weapon. Its perfectly clear and specific.

    No matter what the ATF thinks, A court of law may think different, and until that court case is ruled on its a crap shoot.

    Not to say I think the letters should be taken lightly. They scare the bejesus outta me. Matter of fact until there is some sort of definitive answer I am likely just to go pull the SIG braces off my pistols and I wont be taking them to the range and shooting them like I have been. I hate to feel that way but I am not one of those cavalier throw it in there face types. When It comes to 99% of things, I am not to concerned with interaction with Law enforcement. I am a upstanding tax payer doing nothing wrong and figure I will be given the benefit of the doubt. When it comes to firearms though I toe the line and stay away from anything questionable. You wont find any bits that are questionable (things like short AR barrels that are not built, M16 parts, "solvent traps" or anything of that nature) at my place. In my mind I have way to much to lose to mess with such things when there is really no value to having any of it.
     
  11. jluck

    jluck
    Really,Really, Close to Newport Oregon 97365
    Voted #1 Member

    Messages:
    1,887
    Likes Received:
    1,210
  12. bolus

    bolus
    Portland
    Well-Known Member 2015 Volunteer 2016 Volunteer

    Messages:
    3,600
    Likes Received:
    8,013
    Does anyone use the brace as intended? It just looks so awkward to straight arm fire an AR. Perhaps if you were one handed?
     
  13. IronMonster

    IronMonster
    Free Idaho!
    Opinionated Member Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    4,791
    Likes Received:
    8,691
    I own two of them, They are both marked "pistol" on the lower.

    I felt pretty secure misusing them based on this letter S72-LEGAL-B1404030900021-640x828.jpg
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2014
  14. spectra

    spectra
    The Couve
    Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,921
    Likes Received:
    737
    I had one and well I did not like them at all. I will pay the 200 and do a SBR.....
     
    jbett98 likes this.
  15. 308

    308
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    3,930
    Likes Received:
    9,322
    Sounds like Earl Griffith and Max Kingery should get on the same page. Perhaps they were the ones deciding the legality of Fast and Furious as well.
     
    206thsense and Stomper like this.
  16. Dyjital

    Dyjital
    Albany, Ore
    Flavorite Member Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    5,671
    Likes Received:
    7,893
  17. SOrez

    SOrez
    SOR
    Active Member

    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    201
    So if someone of smaller stature shoulders an AR pistol buffer tube, will that make it a SBR also?
     
    BlindedByScience likes this.
  18. 308

    308
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
    ΜOΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ Silver Supporter

    Messages:
    3,930
    Likes Received:
    9,322
    Midgets and small children are exempt
     
    206thsense and clearconscience like this.
  19. Medic!

    Medic!
    What just happened?
    Pain in the neck. Bronze Supporter

    Messages:
    3,865
    Likes Received:
    9,899
    Crap! Am I gona have to stop putting my Glock up to my shoulder when I shoot it?
     
    clearconscience and 308 like this.
  20. IronMonster

    IronMonster
    Free Idaho!
    Opinionated Member Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    4,791
    Likes Received:
    8,691
    One thing you have to remember through all this. The BATF is an elite force of the best and most brilliant minds the government can assemble, minds that once declared that a shoe string was in fact a machine gun.
     

Share This Page