Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Legal & Political Archive' started by Dave Workman, Dec 30, 2015.
This is a trick question?
TURN BACK, IT'S A TRAP!!
I read about this yesterday and I think it's a great logical offensive position to take. It puts the entire crap pile load right on the backs of the anties. Let's watch'em squirm, let's watch'em try to explain why they're so much better than all the rest of us and how all those law abiding citizens that have complied with all the BS rules and regs and fees to be able to CCW will suddenly become felonious criminal types and go on a rampage. Glad to hear that the senator appears to be following through with his bill and can't wait to see where this goes.
F $*K NO!!! Let em fend for themselves like the rest of us....Might change their tune a bit...
They should be banned from having any services that are denied citizens. No special percs, no armed guards. It should be a life of service not a life of privilege.
Kind of seems like the pot calling the kettle black to me. It takes someone as dumb as a Liberal to tell you guns are bad and need to be confiscated while having a bodyguard standing next to them with a pistol on their hip, or even better having one themselves. You can't argue with someone that has no common sense and you can't fix stupid...
nope, not if my tax dollars go to it. f$&k'm
While havin a bunch of libtards packin for their own protection is a scary proposition, it might just bring them back into the world of reality.
We should try to get something like this on the ballot in OR and WA. I think we have enough time to get this on the ballot and gather enough signatures in both states.
I'm sure that we could get BLM and many of the other prog's in the big urban centers on our side if we say it's to stop some of the government "privilege" and to get rid of some of those "racist murdering cops".
If they want to carry and cost is out of their own pocket fine.
Until such a day my right to my second amendment is unrestricted I see no reason antis should enjoy more rights then I have to that amendment.
NO! You practice what you preach..............
Vote against something, then be prepared to go without. Simple really. You should live within the same circle of protection your constituents are in. Local LEO.
what? why is this up for discussion?
if they dont want guns, then no one gets guns isnt this why we have the 2nd!
Well, let's see...
As a legislator, if you make a conscious or unconscious decision to not support or violate the State or Federal Constitution, then you should lose all those Constitutional rights and be treated as a traitor...
So in other words NO.
And that should be true at all levels of government, right up to the executive branch. Live with what you create. Period...
Perhaps, our elected officials should under go a mental health examination prior to be allowed to take the oath of office...
Nope. They and antis like them shoud "lead" by example.
Should they get anything we can't get? No. But they aren't we. That's why they get to go on 8 million dollar vacations in Hawaii that we pay for, while surrounded by armed security that we pay for so that they can be well rested before going back to Washington to sign executive orders giving them more protection from we the people.
Totally disconnected from their subjects here in the real world.
...they should be forced to carry around a sign that says "GUN FREE ZONE".